Literature DB >> 6371156

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and indirect immunofluorescence assay for Lyme disease.

H Russell, J S Sampson, G P Schmid, H W Wilkinson, B Plikaytis.   

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and ELISA for Lyme disease were estimated. Sera from patients with Lyme disease, patients with other infections, and healthy individuals were examined. Significant cross-reactivity occurred only with sera from patients with syphilis, yaws, and pinta . All tested sera from patients with Lyme disease, however, gave negative results in the rapid reagin screening test and the microhemagglutination assay for antibodies to Treponema pallidum confirmatory for syphilis. When sera from patients with treponemal diseases were excluded from the analysis, the IFA and ELISA were highly specific, having 97% and 100% reliability, respectively. Sensitivity of both tests varied with the stage of disease but was 100% for both tests during complicated Lyme disease. The results indicate that both tests are highly specific and sensitive for complicated Lyme disease but relatively insensitive for patients with erythema chronicum migrans alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6371156     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/149.3.465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  70 in total

1.  Quality control assessment of Canadian laboratories testing for Lyme disease.

Authors:  H Artsob; M Garvie
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1991

2.  Comparative evaluation of three products for the detection of Borrelia burgdorferi antibody in human serum.

Authors:  R D Fister; L A Weymouth; J C McLaughlin; R W Ryan; R C Tilton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Characterization of the protective antibody response to Borrelia burgdorferi in experimentally infected LSH hamsters.

Authors:  J L Schmitz; R F Schell; S D Lovrich; S M Callister; J E Coe
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Antibody response against autologous and heterologous isolates of Borrelia burgdorferi in four patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis.

Authors:  M Karlsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Lyme disease: Is it or is it not?

Authors:  Bl Johnston; Jm Conly
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Interlaboratory comparison of test results for detection of Lyme disease by 516 participants in the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene/College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Program.

Authors:  L L Bakken; S M Callister; P J Wand; R F Schell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  M Karlsson; I Möllegård; G Stiernstedt; B Wretlind
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Experimental Borrelia garinii infection of Japanese quail.

Authors:  E Isogai; S Tanaka; I S Braga; C Itakura; H Isogai; K Kimura; N Fujii
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Isolation of Borrelia spirochetes from patients in Texas.

Authors:  J A Rawlings; P V Fournier; G J Teltow
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of western blot and microimmunofluorescence as tools for Lyme disease seroepidemiology.

Authors:  J P Arzouni; M Laveran; J Beytout; O Ramousse; D Raoult
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.