Literature DB >> 6365599

Comparison of the operating microscope and loupe for microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a randomized clinical trial.

J A Rock, C A Bergquist, A W Kimball, H A Zacur, T M King.   

Abstract

Reversal of sterilization was performed by microsurgical tubal anastomosis in 72 women using either loupe (n = 36) or microscope (n = 36). The study design called for the randomization of patients within pairs, which were matched for method of sterilization and site of anastomosis. A significant difference between methods could not be demonstrated at 12 months (P = 0.39) or 24 months (P = 0.37) after the procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative Studies; Equipment And Supplies; Family Planning; Female Sterilization; Microsurgery; Research Methodology; Reversibility; Reversible Sterilization; Sterilization Reversal; Sterilization, Sexual; Studies; Surgery; Surgical Equipment; Treatment; Tubal Reanastomosis

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6365599     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47595-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  3 in total

1.  Reversal of female sterilisation.

Authors:  J P Calvert
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-01-17

2.  Effectiveness of bilateral tubotubal anastomosis in a large outpatient population.

Authors:  Gary S Berger; John M Thorp; Mark A Weaver
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  The effectiveness of reproductive surgery in the treatment of female infertility: facts, views and vision.

Authors:  J Bosteels; S Weyers; C Mathieu; B W Mol; T D'Hooghe
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.