Literature DB >> 6359316

An analysis of repeated biopsies following cardiac transplantation.

D J Spiegelhalter, P G Stovin.   

Abstract

Biopsy specimens are taken from the heart at regular intervals during the weeks following cardiac transplantation. Three specimens at most have been taken at each session, and classified by the pathologist on a histological four-point scale of rejection. Since the rejection reaction in the myocardium is uniform neither in intensity not distribution, there is often disagreement between the findings from a single session; even after three negative specimens there is some doubt as to whether rejection has taken place. In an attempt to quantify this residual uncertainty, we have adapted a procedure of Dawid and Skene for estimating 'error rates' when the true state is not known. The model is shown to provide a good explanation of the observed data, and provides guidance on the number of negative specimens required to give a defined level of certainty that rejection is not taking place.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6359316     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780020105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  15 in total

1.  A comparison of myocardial perfusion and rejection in cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Andrew L Rivard; Cory M Swingen; Donnevan Blake; Andrea S Huang; Pooja Kanth; Grete F Thomsen; Erin J Cordova; Leslie W Miller; Richard W Bianco; Norbert Wilke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  The utility of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy for the diagnosis of xenograft rejection after CD46 pig-to-baboon cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Davide Ricci; Henry D Tazelaar; Naoto Miyagi; Vinay P Rao; Rachel A Pedersen; Walter K Kremers; Guerard W Byrne; Christopher G A McGregor
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Jun Zheng; Xu-Dong Pan; Ming-Duo Zhang; Tie-Yuan Zhu; Bin Li; Li-Zhong Sun
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Cardiac biopsy interpretation.

Authors:  M E Billingham; H D Tazelaar
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Testing the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting Transplant Rejection Using a Murine Model of Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  K Fischer; S Ohori; F C Meral; M Uehara; S Giannini; T Ichimura; R N Smith; F A Jolesz; I Guleria; Y Zhang; P J White; N J McDannold; K Hoffmeister; M M Givertz; R Abdi
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 6.  Molecular Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection: Animal Experiments and Prospects.

Authors:  Yihan Chen; Li Zhang; Jinfeng Liu; Pingyu Zhang; Xiaoyuan Chen; Mingxing Xie
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Endomyocardial biopsy in the evaluation of conditions leading to cardiac transplantation and in the evaluation of cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  H A McAllister
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1995

Review 8.  Myocardial edema imaging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: current status and future potential.

Authors:  Iacopo Carbone; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Heart transplant pathology: the British experience.

Authors:  A Pomerance; P G Stovin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of acute heart transplant rejection: a review.

Authors:  Craig R Butler; Richard Thompson; Mark Haykowsky; Mustafa Toma; Ian Paterson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.