Literature DB >> 6356862

Electrocardiographic and clinical criteria for recognition of acute myocardial infarction based on analysis of 3,697 patients.

R E Rude, W K Poole, J E Muller, Z Turi, J Rutherford, C Parker, R Roberts, D S Raabe, H K Gold, P H Stone.   

Abstract

Over a 34.5-month period, all admissions to 5 university hospital coronary care units were screened for eligibility for the Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS), an ongoing study of the effects of hyaluronidase, propranolol and placebo on myocardial infarct (MI) size. Of 3,697 patients with greater than or equal to 30 minutes of discomfort that was thought to reflect myocardial ischemia who were assessed for the presence or absence of certain electrocardiographic abnormalities at the time of hospital admission, the electrocardiogram was considered predictive of acute MI if greater than or equal to 1 of the following abnormalities was present: new or presumably new Q waves (greater than or equal to 30 ms wide and 0.20 mV deep) in at least 2 of the 3 diaphragmatic leads (II, III, aVF), or in at least 2 of the 6 precordial leads (V1 to V6), or in I and aVL; new or presumably new ST-segment elevation or depression of greater than or equal to 0.10 mV in 1 of the same lead combinations; or complete left bundle branch block. In the screened population, the diagnostic sensitivity of the electrocardiographic criteria was 81%, whereas the overall infarct rate in the total population screened was 49%. The diagnostic specificity of these entry criteria was 69% and the predictive value 72%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6356862     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90508-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  34 in total

1.  Electrocardiographic ST segment elevation in adults with chest pain.

Authors:  W J Brady; F Morris
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-11

2.  The acute myocardial infarction patient with an initially non-diagnostic electrocardiogram.

Authors:  W J Brady; F Morris
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-09

3.  New advances in the management of acute coronary syndromes: 1. Matching treatment to risk.

Authors:  D Fitchett; S Goodman; A Langer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  The electrocardiogram in ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: correlation with coronary anatomy and prognosis.

Authors:  Y Birnbaum; B J Drew
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A D Timmis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-10-27

6.  Molecular imaging: Measuring myocardial fatty acid metabolism with BMIPP SPECT.

Authors:  Raphaël Duivenvoorden; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Advances in the early diagnosis and management of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Vincent
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03

8.  Use of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction by general practitioners.

Authors:  S Rule; P Brooksby; J Sanderson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Gianmarco Vizzeri; Linda M Zangwill; Luciana M Alencar; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Comparison of the value of novel rapid measurement of myoglobin, creatine kinase, and creatine kinase-MB with the electrocardiogram for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H S Lee; S J Cross; P Garthwaite; A Dickie; I Ross; S Walton; K Jennings
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.