Literature DB >> 6352081

Prospective randomized trial of intravenous and intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction.

W J Rogers, J A Mantle, W P Hood, W A Baxley, P L Whitlow, R C Reeves, B Soto.   

Abstract

To evaluate the relative thrombolytic efficacy and complications of intracoronary vs high-dose, short-term intravenous streptokinase infusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, we performed baseline coronary arteriography and then randomly allocated 51 patients with acute myocardial infarction to receive either intracoronary (n = 25) or intravenous (n = 26) streptokinase. Patients getting the drug by the intracoronary route received 240,000 IU of streptokinase into the infarct-related artery over 1 hr, whereas those getting the drug by the intravenous route received either 500,000 IU of streptokinase over 15 min (n = 10) or 1 million IU of streptokinase over 45 min (n = 16). Angiographically observed thrombolysis occurred in 76% (19/25) of the patients receiving intracoronary streptokinase, in 10% (1/10) of the patients receiving 500,000 IU of streptokinase intravenously, and in 44% (7/16) of the patients receiving 1 million IU of streptokinase intravenously. Among patients in whom thrombolysis was observed, mean elapsed time from onset of streptokinase infusion until lysis was 31 +/- 18 min in patients receiving intracoronary streptokinase and 38 +/- 20 min in those receiving intravenous streptokinase (p = NS). Among patients in whom intravenous streptokinase "failed," intracoronary streptokinase in combination with intracoronary guidewire manipulation recanalized only 7% (1/15). Fibrinogen levels within 6 hr after streptokinase were significantly lower in the patients receiving intravenous streptokinase (39 +/- 17 mg/dl) than the levels in those receiving intracoronary streptokinase (88 +/- 70 mg/dl) (p less than .05) but were similar 24 hr after streptokinase in the two groups. Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in one patient in each group. Thus, in this prospective randomized trial of intracoronary vs intravenous streptokinase, hemorrhagic complications were few, although both regimens produced a systemic lytic state. Although the thrombolytic efficacy of intracoronary streptokinase was superior to that of high-dose, short-term intravenous streptokinase, the higher-dose intravenous regimen (1 million IU over 45 min) achieved thrombolysis in a significant minority (44%) of patients and might be useful therapy for patients not having access to emergency catheterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6352081     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.68.5.1051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  14 in total

1.  Intra-arterial thrombolysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Is thrombolysis alone the best therapy for acute myocardial infarction? Current status and emerging strategies.

Authors:  P Golino; J T Willerson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

3.  Coronary Artery Patency and Survival in Clinical Trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Back to the future: so what will fibrinolytic therapy offer your patients with myocardial infarction?

Authors:  J R Mitchell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-04-12

Review 5.  Intravenous streptokinase. A reappraisal of its therapeutic use in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K L Goa; J M Henwood; J F Stolz; M S Langley; S P Clissold
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Intravenous fibrinolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction: new perspectives from plasminogen activators?

Authors:  W Kasper; T Meinertz; H Just
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1986-04-01

7.  Acute coronary occlusion and reperfusion. Reliability of angiographic classification and grading.

Authors:  S G Sorensen; R A Hackworthy; P G Fitzpatrick; W H Barry; R L Menlove; J L Anderson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients: implications and interpretation of IMS III, MR RESCUE, and SYNTHESIS EXPANSION trials: A report from the Working Group of International Congress of Interventional Neurology.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Foad Abd-Allah; Aitziber Aleu; John J Connors; Ricardo A Hanel; Ameer E Hassan; Haitham M Hussein; Nazli A Janjua; Rakesh Khatri; Jawad F Kirmani; Mikael Mazighi; Heinrich P Mattle; Jefferson T Miley; Thanh N Nguyen; Gustavo J Rodriguez; Qaisar A Shah; Adnan H Siddiqui; Jose I Suarez; M Fareed K Suri; Reha Tolun
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-05

9.  Long term improvement in global left ventricular function after early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Report of a randomised multicentre trial of intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J C Res; M L Simoons; E E van der Wall; M J van Eenige; F Vermeer; F W Verheugt; W Wijns; S Braat; W J Remme; P W Serruys
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-11

Review 10.  Adverse reactions to thrombolytic agents. Implications for coronary reperfusion following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Nazari; R Davison; K Kaplan; D Fintel
Journal:  Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.