Literature DB >> 6343284

The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division.

C W Birky.   

Abstract

When an organism has only one or two mitochondria or chloroplasts per cell, it is probable that their partitioning is always stringently controlled so that each daughter cell always receives half the organelles in the parent cell. When there are more copies of an organelle, the available data suggest that partitioning is stochastic but far from random, with a strong tendency toward equality. The molecular mechanisms that promote equal partitioning are not known in any case, but the great variety of organelle behavior suggests that many different mechanisms are involved in different organisms. As Wilson (1925) pointed out, the precision of partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles rarely if ever equals that of mitosis, but it is still an expression of selection for mechanisms that will ensure the hereditary continuity of the organelles. How cells compensate for unequal partitioning by controlling organelle replication is known for only one case. But when one considers that Tetrahymena and Paramecium use different methods to compensate for unequal partitioning of macronuclear DNA, it would not be surprising if organisms use a variety of different compensating replication modes for organelles as well. What is surprising is that so little attention has been paid to these problems. Nothing could be simpler than counting organelles in dividing cells, but this has been done on a large scale in only two systems. Quantitative techniques in cell biology have been developed to the point where such studies could be done even on cells that have too many organelles for direct counting. Molecular mechanisms of partitioning have scarcely been touched on. Much more has been done on the role of the cytoskeleton in determining cell shape, and some observations have been made on its role in positioning organelles in interphase cells, but these kinds of studies have not been extended to dividing cells. Some experiments and observations have been made on the role of microtubules and microfilaments in moving cytoplasmic organelles around the cell during interphase, but again nothing has been done on their possible role in partitioning organelles at cytokinesis. The major lesson of this article is how little has been done, and how much can be done. The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division is a wide-open field for future research, and one of great importance for both genetics and cell biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6343284     DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-364376-6.50009-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Rev Cytol Suppl        ISSN: 0074-770X


  44 in total

1.  Rapid, endoplasmic reticulum-independent diffusion of the mitotic Golgi haze.

Authors:  Magnus A B Axelsson; Graham Warren
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Importance of mitochondrial dynamics during meiosis and sporulation.

Authors:  Steven W Gorsich; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Non-genetic heterogeneity from stochastic partitioning at cell division.

Authors:  Dann Huh; Johan Paulsson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Endoplasmic reticulum positioning and partitioning in mitotic HeLa cells.

Authors:  Simon McCullough; John Lucocq
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Intracellular selection, conversion bias, and the expected substitution rate of organelle genes.

Authors:  J B Walsh
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Stability and robustness of an organelle number control system: modeling and measuring homeostatic regulation of centriole abundance.

Authors:  Wallace F Marshall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Plant mitochondrial recombination surveillance requires unusual RecA and MutS homologs.

Authors:  Vikas Shedge; Maria Arrieta-Montiel; Alan C Christensen; Sally A Mackenzie
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  A quantitative study of growth variability of tumour cell clones in vitro.

Authors:  C Tomelleri; E Milotti; C Dalla Pellegrina; O Perbellini; A Del Fabbro; M T Scupoli; R Chignola
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.831

9.  Homoplasmic yeast cells contain no selectable "hidden" mitochondrial alleles.

Authors:  J E Lewis; C W Birky
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Association of mitochondria with microtubules inhibits mitochondrial fission by precluding assembly of the fission protein Dnm1.

Authors:  Kritika Mehta; Leeba Ann Chacko; Manjyot Kaur Chug; Siddharth Jhunjhunwala; Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.