Literature DB >> 6342625

Low-dose D-penicillamine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

H J Williams, J R Ward, J C Reading, M J Egger, J T Grandone, C O Samuelson, D E Furst, J M Sullivan, M A Watson, M Guttadauria, E S Cathcart, S B Kaplan, J T Halla, A Weinstein, P H Plotz.   

Abstract

Two hundred twenty-five patients with active severe rheumatoid arthritis were admitted to a multiclinic, controlled, double-blind trial comparing the use of 500 mg D-penicillamine per day, 125 mg D-penicillamine per day, and placebo. One hundred seventy-one patients completed at least 30 weeks of therapy. The 500 mg D-penicillamine group demonstrated statistically significant improvement over the placebo group in grip strength, average circumference of swollen proximal interphalangeal joints, and patient assessment. While the trend was for greater improvement with the larger dose of D-penicillamine, there was no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups in duration of morning stiffness, walking time, physician's assessment, number of swollen joints, or scores for tender and swollen joints. The slight increase in efficacy of higher dose D-penicillamine was associated with increased toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6342625     DOI: 10.1002/art.1780260502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  10 in total

Review 1.  Compliance in clinical trials.

Authors:  T Pullar; S Kumar; M Feely
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: radiological assessments and the effects of anti-rheumatic drugs.

Authors:  D L Scott; P A Bacon
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  A rheumatological dilemma: is it possible to modify the course of rheumatoid arthritis? Can we answer the question?

Authors:  T Pullar; H A Capell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Rational use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Authors:  D E Furst
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Progressive joint damage during penicillamine therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D L Scott; A Greenwood; R Bryans; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 6.  Penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis. A problem of toxicity.

Authors:  H G Taylor; A Samanta
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  [Measuring disease activity for rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  D Aletaha; T Stamm; J Smolen
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis: relationships of plasma tumor necrosis factor-alpha, soluble interleukin 2-receptor, soluble CD4/CD8 ratio, neopterin, and fibrin D-dimer to traditional severity and functional measures.

Authors:  J C Beckham; D S Caldwell; B L Peterson; A M Pippen; M S Currie; F J Keefe; J B Weinberg
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 9.  Guidelines for the use of conventional and newer disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alejandro Díaz-Borjón
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Number needed to treat (NNT): implication in rheumatology clinical practice.

Authors:  M Osiri; M E Suarez-Almazor; G A Wells; V Robinson; P Tugwell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 19.103

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.