Literature DB >> 6342103

The emergence of bacterial resistance and its influence on empiric therapy.

H C Neu.   

Abstract

The discovery of antimicrobial agents had a major impact on the rate of survival from infections. However, the changing patterns of antimicrobial resistance caused a demand for new antibacterial agents. Within a few years of the introduction of penicillin, the majority of staphylococci were resistant to that drug. In the 1960s the production of the semisynthetic penicillins provided an answer to the problem of staphylococcal resistance. In the early 1960s most Escherichia coli were susceptible to the new beta-lactam antibiotic ampicillin; by the end of that decade, plasmid-mediated beta-lactamase resistance was found in 30%-50% of hospital-acquired E. coli. Use of certain agents resulted in the selection of bacteria, such as Klebsiella, that are intrinsically resistant to ampicillin. The original cephalosporins were stable to beta-lactamase, but the use of these agents was in part responsible for the appearance of infections due to Enterobacter species, Citrobacter species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These bacteria, as well as Serratia, were resistant to many of the available beta-lactam agents. Aminoglycosides initially provided excellent activity against most of the facultative gram-negative bacteria. However, the widespread dissemination of the genes that cause production of the aminoglycoside-inactivating enzymes altered the use of those agents. Clearly, the evolution of bacterial resistance has altered the prescribing patterns for antimicrobial agents. Knowledge that beta-lactam resistance to ampicillin or cephalothin is prevalent is causing physicians to select as empiric therapy either a combination of two or more agents or agents to which resistance is uncommon. The new cephalosporins offer a broad spectrum of anti-bacterial activity coupled with low toxicity. However, physicians must closely follow the changing ecology of bacteria when these agents are used, because cephalosporins can also select bacteria resistant to themselves and thereby abolish their value as empiric therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6342103     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/5.supplement_1.s9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Infect Dis        ISSN: 0162-0886


  15 in total

Review 1.  Discovery and development of new antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  T D Gootz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Infectious drug resistance.

Authors:  B A Lewis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Sulbactam/ampicillin in the treatment of lower respiratory infections.

Authors:  M A Castellano
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Audit of antibiotic usage in medium-sized general hospital over an 11-year period. The impact of antibiotic policies.

Authors:  J C McElnay; M G Scott; J Y Sidara; P Kearney
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1995-11-24

5.  Carriage of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli by healthy volunteers during a 15-week period.

Authors:  N London; R Nijsten; A van der Bogaard; E Stobberingh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Enhanced in vitro bactericidal activity of amikacin or gentamicin combined with three new extended-spectrum cephalosporins against cephalothin-resistant members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  A S Bayer; R Eisenstadt; J O Morrison
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Infections in intensive care patients: use of new B-lactams.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1984-09

8.  What do beta-lactamases mean for clinical efficacy?

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant faecal Escherichia coli in healthy volunteers in Venezuela.

Authors:  H J van de Mortel; E J Jansen; G J Dinant; N London; E Palacios Prü; E E Stobberingh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Moxalactam in nosocomial infections with Serratia marcescens.

Authors:  T Mall; F Follath; M Salfinger; R Ritz; H Reber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.