Literature DB >> 6341339

Time course of the bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled histamine and methacholine.

A Cartier, J L Malo, P Bégin, M Sestier, R R Martin.   

Abstract

Eleven asthmatic subjects inhaled doubling concentrations of histamine until a near sixfold increase in total pulmonary flow resistance had been reached. This last concentration (C6) of histamine and methacholine was administered on two subsequent separate visits. Specific lung conductance (sGL) dropped to 18.6 +/- 7.9 (SD) and 19.1 +/- 10.3% of initial value after histamine and methacholine, respectively (NS). Whereas the peak action occurred in a similar interval (1-4 min), the mean duration of the subsequent plateau, defined as values of sGL within 20% of the maximum fall was 16.8 +/- 9.8 min for histamine and 74.6 +/- 53.7 min for methacholine (P less than 0.01). The recovery phase from the end of the plateau to base line lasted 25.5 +/- 14.4 min for histamine and 56.7 +/- 38.3 min for methacholine (P less than 0.01). The duration of plateau and recovery phases were not linked with base-line sGL, maximum fall in sGL, or C6. We conclude that for the same induced bronchoconstriction methacholine has a more prolonged action than histamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6341339     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.3.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol        ISSN: 0161-7567


  21 in total

1.  The prone position results in smaller ventilation defects during bronchoconstriction in asthma.

Authors:  R Scott Harris; Tilo Winkler; Guido Musch; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Tobias Schroeder; Nora Tgavalekos; José G Venegas
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-05-14

Review 2.  Bronchial provocation tests with pharmacological agents.

Authors:  C B Robinson; G H Parsons
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1990 Summer-Fall

3.  What Causes Uneven Aerosol Deposition in the Bronchoconstricted Lung? A Quantitative Imaging Study.

Authors:  Elliot Eliyahu Greenblatt; Tilo Winkler; Robert Scott Harris; Vanessa Jane Kelly; Mamary Kone; Ira Katz; Andrew R Martin; George Caillibotte; Jose Venegas
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.849

4.  Regional airflow obstruction after bronchoconstriction and subsequent bronchodilation in subjects without pulmonary disease.

Authors:  E T Geier; R J Theilmann; G K Prisk; R C Sá
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-05-23

5.  Spatial persistence of reduced specific ventilation following methacholine challenge in the healthy human lung.

Authors:  E T Geier; I Neuhart; R J Theilmann; G K Prisk; R C Sá
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-02-08

Review 6.  Measurement of bronchial responsiveness.

Authors:  C J Trigg; R J Davies
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1989

7.  Comparative bronchial responses to hyperosmolar saline and methacholine in asthma.

Authors:  L P Boulet; C Legris; L Thibault; H Turcotte
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Protective effect by UCB JO28 against histamine and methacholine induced bronchial hyperreactivity.

Authors:  F P Maesen; J J Smeets; E Baltes; J P Rihoux
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Three paradigms of airway smooth muscle hyperresponsiveness in young guinea pigs.

Authors:  Pasquale Chitano; Lu Wang; Thomas M Murphy
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.273

10.  Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: reproducibility and sensitivity of different indices to assess response.

Authors:  P Dehaut; A Rachiele; R R Martin; J L Malo
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.