| Literature DB >> 6339631 |
E A Goidl, T Hayama, G M Shepherd, G W Siskind, G J Thorbecke.
Abstract
(1) Evidence has been presented that the detection of hapten-augmentable plaques indicates cells whose secretion of antibody had been blocked by the binding of auto-anti-id to cell surface idiotypes. Because of the dependence of the assay on the affinities of the various species for one another, the number of hapten-augmentable plaques detected should be regarded as a minimal estimate of the number of cells whose secretion of antibody is inhibited by auto-anti-id. For confirmation that hapten-augmentable PFC are due to auto-anti-id 2 principal controls are important: (a) incubation of the spleen cell population with hapten prior to plaquing should remove the hapten-augmentable PFC; (b) the dialyzed supernate from hapten incubated cells should inhibit plaque formation in a hapten-reversible manner. (2) Evidence has been presented that hapten-reversible inhibition of plaque formation can serve as an assay for anti-id. Apparent false positive assays can result from the presence of anti-hapten antibody or antigen-antibody complexes; however, these apparent false positives are rarely reversed by hapten. Removal of anti-hapten antibody, by passage over an antigen immunoadsorbent, will eliminate this source of false positives and the procedure is recommended. False negative results can arise from mismatching of the anti-ids in the sample to be assayed and the idiotypes of the target cells used in the assay. This can result from shifts in idiotype expression related to age and time after antigen injection. False negatives can also result from the presence of idiotype-anti-id complexes in the sample to be assayed. This source of false negatives can sometimes be eliminated by passage of the sample through an antigen immunoadsorbent.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1983 PMID: 6339631 DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90258-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Methods ISSN: 0022-1759 Impact factor: 2.303