Literature DB >> 6332178

A randomized comparison of high-dose infusion methotrexate versus standard-dose weekly therapy in head and neck squamous cancer.

S G Taylor, W P McGuire, W W Hauck, J L Showel, T E Lad.   

Abstract

Forty-seven patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cancer were entered into a prospectively controlled study comparing high-dose infusion methotrexate with leucovorin against standard-dose methotrexate without leucovorin. Patients were stratified for prior treatment and hematogenous metastases prior to randomization. Patients received either methotrexate (1,500 mg/m2) infused over 24 hours with leucovorin or 40 mg/m2 intramuscularly. Each treatment was given weekly for the first six weeks and followed a dose escalation schedule to toxicity. After six weeks patients received the high-dose regimen every two weeks and the low-dose schedule continued weekly. One patient was ineligible and four had inadequate follow-up to assess response (less than two weeks). Forty-two patients were evaluable for survival and 37 for response. Six of 19 patients (32%) treated with high-dose infusion responded (one complete response) and four of 18 patients (22%) receiving standard dosage responded (P = .52). Treatment with high-dose methotrexate resulted in an improved duration of disease control over standard dosage with the respective median times to progression of 11 weeks and five weeks (P = .04). These differences were most marked in good performance status patients (P = .007) and those without hematogenous dissemination (P = .02). Toxicity, however, was also significantly worse in the high-dose treatment group (P = .01) and survival was identical between treatments (4.2 months). The authors conclude that any treatment advantage to high-dose methotrexate may be attributable to its greater toxicity rather than to a selective therapeutic effect and this regimen does not result in improved patient survival. Good performance status patients may benefit from more aggressive therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6332178     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.9.1006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

1.  Long-term survival of a patient with leptomeningeal involvement by nasopharyngeal carcinoma after treatment with high-dose intravenous methotrexate.

Authors:  Carole Fakhry; Gopal Bajaj; Nafi Aygun; William Westra; Maura Gillison
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Methotrexate (MTX) concentration in tumors following low-dose MTX.

Authors:  N J Winick; B A Kamen; A Streckfuss; J Craig; F McGuirt; R L Capizzi; F Sklar; D Coln
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Head and neck cancer: guidelines for chemotherapy.

Authors:  G Catimel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Chemotherapeutic management of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  M Al-Sarraf
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 5.  Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ambika Parmar; Michaelina Macluskey; Niall Mc Goldrick; David I Conway; Anne-Marie Glenny; Janet E Clarkson; Helen V Worthington; Kelvin Kw Chan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 6.  Chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alessandro Guidi; Carla Codecà; Daris Ferrari
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Palliative low dose fortnightly methotrexate in oral cancers: Experience at a rural cancer centre from India.

Authors:  Santam Chakraborty; M Geetha; K M Sujith; M S Biji; B Sateeshan
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2014-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.