Literature DB >> 6329405

Single blind comparison of ketoconazole 200 mg oral tablets and clotrimazole 100 mg vaginal tablets and 1% cream in treating acute vaginal candidosis.

J S Bingham.   

Abstract

A single blind study of 103 women with vaginal candidosis was undertaken to compare treatment with conventional topical clotrimazole and oral ketoconazole. Both treatment regimens were equally effective in terms of clinical symptoms, negative results on culture for Candida albicans, and relapse rates. As treatment for vaginal candidosis takes several days, patient compliance is important and the success of a treatment regimen may depend on its acceptability to patients. Those in this study who had previously been treated for vaginal candidosis were asked to compare their current and previous treatments. Significantly more (p less than 0.001) of those treated with ketoconazole than those treated with clotrimazole found it more acceptable than previous treatment. This indicated a strong preference for oral treatment, and oral antifungal agents may be the treatment of choice for vaginal candidosis in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6329405      PMCID: PMC1046294          DOI: 10.1136/sti.60.3.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Vener Dis        ISSN: 0007-134X


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of miconazole-coated tampons with clotrimazole vaginal tablets in the treatment of vaginal candidosis.

Authors:  M J Balsdon
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1981-08

2.  A comparison between the effects of nystatin, clotrimazole and miconazole on vaginal candidiasis.

Authors:  B W Eliot; R C Howat; A E Mack
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1979-07
  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  Patient preferences and treatment safety for uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis in primary health care.

Authors:  Isabel Del-Cura González; Francisca García-de-Blas González; Teresa Sanz Cuesta; Jesús Martín Fernández; Justo M Del-Alamo Rodríguez; Rosa A Escriva Ferrairo; M Del Canto De-Hoyos Alonso; Laura Balsalobre Arenas; Ricardo Rodríguez Barrientos; Elisa Ceresuela Wiesmann; Cristina De-Alba Romero; Yolanda Ginés Díaz; Ana Pastor Rodríguez-Moñino; Blanca Gutiérrez Teira; Marta Sánchez-Celaya Del Pozo; Jesús Fernández Horcajuelo; María J Rojas Giraldo; Paulino Cubero González; Rocío A Vello Cuadrado; Beatriz López Uriarte; Jeannet Sánchez Yepes; Yolanda Hernando Sanz; M José Iglesias Piñeiro; Susana Tudanca Hernández; Fernando Gallardo Alonso; Ana I González González; Alicia Simón Fernández; Carmen Carballo; Ana Rey López; Fernanda Morales; Dolores Martínez López
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Ketoconazole: a reappraisal.

Authors:  R J Hay
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-01-26

3.  Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronized progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Christophe Blockeel; Gennady T Sukhikh; Ameet Patki; Bharati Dhorepatil; Dong-Zi Yang; Zi-Jiang Chen; Elke Kahler; Claire Pexman-Fieth; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Dydrogesterone as an oral alternative to vaginal progesterone for IVF luteal phase support: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Christophe Blockeel; Elke Kahler; Claire Pexman-Fieth; Jan I Olofsson; Stefan Driessen; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.