Literature DB >> 6327727

Chemoattraction and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum: myxamoeba cannot read spatial gradients of cyclic adenosine monophosphate.

M G Vicker, W Schill, K Drescher.   

Abstract

Myxamoebae of the morphogenetic cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum are thought to be able to accurately read and respond to directional information in spatial gradients of cyclic AMP. We examined the spatial and temporal mechanisms proposed for chemotaxis by comparing the behavior of spreading or evenly distributed cell populations after exposure to well-defined spatial gradients. The effects of gradient generation on cells were avoided by using predeveloped gradients. Qualitatively different responses were obtained using (a) isotropic, (b) static spatial, or (c) temporal (impulse) gradients in a simple chamber of penetrable micropore filters. We simulated models of chemotaxis and chemokinesis to aid our interpretations. The attractive and locomotory responses of populations were maximally stimulated by 0.05 microM cyclic AMP, provided that cellular phosphodiesterase was inhibited. But a single impulse of cyclic AMP during gradient development caused a greater and qualitatively different attraction. Attraction in spatial gradients was only transient, in that populations eventually developed a random distribution when confined to a narrow territory. Populations never accumulated nor lost their random distribution even in extremely steep spatial gradients. Attraction in spatial gradients was inducible only in spreading populations, not randomly distributed ones. Thus, spatial gradients effect biased-random locomotion: i.e., chemokinesis without adaptation. Cells cannot read gradients; the reaction of the cells is stochastic. Spatial gradients do not cause chemotaxis, which probably requires a sharp stimulant concentration increase (a temporal gradient) as a pulse or impulse. The results also bear on concepts of how embryonic cells might be able to decipher the positional information in a morphogen spatial gradient during development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6327727      PMCID: PMC2113049          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.98.6.2204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  69 in total

1.  Cell aggregation in Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  T M KONIJN; K B RAPER
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1961-12       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Retraction fibers and leucocyte chemotaxis.

Authors:  W S Ramsey
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Phosphodiesterase in Dictyostelium discoideum and the chemotactic response to cyclic adenosine monophosphate.

Authors:  R G Pannbacker; L J Bravard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Chemotaxis and the early stages of aggregation in cellular slime molds.

Authors:  M H Cohen; A Robertson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  H C Berg; P M Tedesco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The kinetics of neutrophil activation. The response to chemotactic peptides depends upon whether ligand-receptor interaction is rate-limiting.

Authors:  L A Sklar; A J Jesaitis; R G Painter; C G Cochrane
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1981-10-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Signal input for a chemotactic response in the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  J M Mato; A Losada; V Nanjundiah; T M Konijn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Dictyostelium chemotactic response to spatial and temporal gradients. Theories of the limits of chemotactic sensitivity and of pseudochemotaxis.

Authors:  R P Futrelle
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.429

9.  Control of Aggregation in Dictyostelium discoideum by an External Periodic Pulse of Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate.

Authors:  A Robertson; D J Drage; M H Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Cyclic 3',5'-AMP relay in Dictyostelium discoideum IV. Recovery of the cAMP signaling response after adaptation to cAMP.

Authors:  M C Dinauer; T L Steck; P N Devreotes
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantification of motility and area changes of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae in response to chemoattractants.

Authors:  J E Segall
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Gradient sensing in defined chemotactic fields.

Authors:  Monica Skoge; Micha Adler; Alex Groisman; Herbert Levine; William F Loomis; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Establishing direction during chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Wouter-Jan Rappel; Peter J Thomas; Herbert Levine; William F Loomis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Quantitative analysis of cell motility and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum by using an image processing system and a novel chemotaxis chamber providing stationary chemical gradients.

Authors:  P R Fisher; R Merkl; G Gerisch
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 10.539

5.  Selection of chemotaxis mutants of Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  J E Segall; P R Fisher; G Gerisch
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Ligand-induced changes in the location of actin, myosin, 95K (alpha-actinin), and 120K protein in amebae of Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  J M Carboni; J S Condeelis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 10.539

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.