Literature DB >> 6323356

Interferometric analysis of intrasection and intersection thickness variability associated with cryostat microtomy.

A Anthony, G J Colurso, T M Bocan, J A Doebler.   

Abstract

Mach-Zehnder interferometric measurements were used to assess the extent of section thickness variability (inter- and intrasection) associated with cryostat microtomy of adrenal sections over a typical working range of 10-20 micron. Sections were obtained using a Bright's Cambridge rocking type and a Damon rotary type cryostat microtome to allow comparative analyses. The effective thickness of tissue sections after being mounted onto slides by flash drying was reduced by 90% relative to microtome section thickness setting. A linear relationship between measured thickness and microtome setting was obtained with both instruments. Thickness variability between replicate sections over the range of microtome settings approximated 11% for the rocking microtome and 5% with the rotary microtome. Average intrasection variability was found to be 7% for rocking microtome sections and 4% for sections obtained with the rotary microtome. However, this variability is a negligible source of error in cytophotometric analyses, providing replicate sections are used and an adequate number of measurements are made on mask-delimited individual cells or tissue specimen areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6323356     DOI: 10.1007/bf01003436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochem J        ISSN: 0018-2214


  10 in total

1.  [The interference transmitted-light microscope of E. Leitz].

Authors:  J GREHN
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  1960-06-30       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  On the cutting and thickness determination of microtome sections; a study in quantitative cytology.

Authors:  O HALLEN
Journal:  Acta Anat Suppl (Basel)       Date:  1955

3.  Determination of section thickness in quantitative microspectrophotometry.

Authors:  R W MERRIAM
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1957 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  Determination of thickness of microscopic objects.

Authors:  P W LANGE; A ENGSTROM
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1954 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  Cytochemical bioassay and radioimmunoassay of ACTH in noise stressed rats.

Authors:  A Anthony; N W Brister; G J Colurso
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  A critical evaluation of quantitative histo- and cytochemical microscopic techniques.

Authors:  D GLICK; A ENGSTROM; B G MALMSTROM
Journal:  Science       Date:  1951-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The cytochemical bioassay of hormones.

Authors:  J Chayen; J R Daly; N Loveridge; L Bitensky
Journal:  Recent Prog Horm Res       Date:  1976

8.  Further studies on section thickness measurement.

Authors:  A D Pearse; R Marks
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1976-07

9.  Measurement of section thickness in quantitative microscopy with special reference to enzyme histochemistry.

Authors:  A D Pearse; R Marks
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Interferometric studies of endothelial cells in primary culture.

Authors:  J Bereiter-Hahn; C Wientzeck; H Bröhl
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1981
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Determination of correction factors of 3H-beta-self-absorption for quantitative evaluation of grain number in autoradiographic studies. Interferometric studies of different cell types in the mouse brain.

Authors:  H Korr
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1985

2.  Quantitative enzyme histochemistry of rat foetal brain and trigeminal ganglion.

Authors:  P Chieco; P Hrelia; G Lisignoli; G Cantelli-Forti
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1988-08

3.  Microfluidic processor allows rapid HER2 immunohistochemistry of breast carcinomas and significantly reduces ambiguous (2+) read-outs.

Authors:  Ata Tuna Ciftlik; Hans-Anton Lehr; Martin A M Gijs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A novel quantitative approach for eliminating sample-to-sample variation using a hue saturation value analysis program.

Authors:  Katsumi Yabusaki; Tyler Faits; Eri McMullen; Jose Luiz Figueiredo; Masanori Aikawa; Elena Aikawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.