Literature DB >> 6322081

Prognostic features of sarcomas and mixed tumors of the endometrium.

W A Peters, N B Kumar, W P Fleming, G W Morley.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of 103 patients with endometrial sarcomas treated at the University of Michigan Hospital includes 47 mixed homologous tumors, 32 mixed heterologous tumors, 21 pure homologous sarcomas (endometrial stromal sarcoma), and three pure heterologous sarcomas (rhabdomyosarcomas). Clinical characteristics appeared similar among the four patient groups. Fourteen percent of the patients had received previous pelvic irradiation. Twenty-nine percent of the patients with a clinical stage I or II tumor had extrauterine disease discovered at surgery. Extent of the tumor at the time of surgery strongly correlated with outcome, and only two patients with extrauterine disease were long-term survivors. Life table survival probability at five years was 58% with surgical stage I, 33% with surgical stage II, 13% with surgical stage III, 0 with surgical stage IV, and 5% in patients referred with recurrence. Risk factors predicting treatment failure were analyzed separately in surgical stages I and II using Cox model analysis. There was no difference in risk for treatment failure between pure endometrial stromal sarcoma, mixed homologous sarcoma, or mixed heterologous sarcoma. The strongest factor correlating with a poor outcome was deep myometrial invasion (P less than .001). An adverse trend was detected in those patients with previous pelvic irradiation, with advancing patient age, and with increasing uterine size, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Neither the presence of heterologous tumor elements nor cervical involvement were found to be adverse prognostic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6322081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Prediction of the prognosis of liver cirrhosis in Japanese using Cox's proportional hazard model.

Authors:  Y Tsuji; S Koga; H Ibayashi; Y Nose; K Akazawa
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1987-10

Review 2.  Malignant biphasic uterine tumours: carcinosarcomas or metaplastic carcinomas?

Authors:  W G McCluggage
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Uterine/female genital sarcomas.

Authors:  M L Hensley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-06

4.  Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of patients with uterine sarcoma: analysis of 127 patients at a single institution, 1989-2007.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Uterine sarcomas in Port Harcourt, Nigeria: a 12-year clinico-pathologic study.

Authors:  D Seleye-Fubara; S A Uzoigwe
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  Bcl-2 expression and other clinicopathologic parameters in uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Klaus Bodner; Barbara Bodner-Adler; Oliver Kimberger; Klaus Czerwenka; Klaus Mayerhofer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004-02-28       Impact factor: 1.704

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.