Literature DB >> 6321364

Further characterization of Marek's disease virus-infected lymphocytes. I. In vivo infection.

B W Calnek, K A Schat, L J Ross, W R Shek, C L Chen.   

Abstract

Previous reports from this laboratory identified bursa-derived lymphocytes (B cells) and non-B cells as the predominant cell types respectively involved in the early cytolytic and subsequent latent infection of chickens with Marek's disease virus (MDV). It was not known whether these differences were qualitative or quantitative or if the method for detection of latent infection (viral antigen production after 48 h of in vitro cultivation) was sensitive enough. To further define the cells involved in the various phases of MDV infection, we used monoclonal antibodies which specifically react with B cells, or T cells, or la-antigen-bearing cells. Dual fluorescence tests to detect surface markers and viral internal antigen (VIA) were conducted with infected spleen cells freshly collected from MDV-infected chickens or after in vitro cultivation of those cells. The same antibodies were also used for a rosetting procedure to yield fractions enriched or depleted of T cells, B cells or la-bearing cells. These were examined directly for viral DNA by in situ hybridization or dot blot DNA hybridization and for VIA cultivation. We learned that infected T cells also comprise part of the early cytolytic phase of MDV infection but constitute a minority population (approximately 2-3%) compared to B cells (83-92%) at 3 or 4 days post infection. Latently infected cells were definitively identified as mostly la-bearing T cells, although a few (2-4%) were B cells. Prior to in vitro cultivation, latently infected cells apparently had insufficient viral DNA for detection by in situ hybridization, but the more sensitive dot blot procedure revealed viral DNA in fractions later found positive by VIA expression after in vitro cultivation. Viral DNA replication in latently infected cells apparently had occurred after 48 h cultivation because in situ hybridization detected infected cells at that time. Treatment of cell cultures with iodo-deoxyuridine, 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate or n-butyrate failed to increase the number of spleen cells which expressed VIA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6321364     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910330318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  23 in total

1.  Differential cytokine responses following Marek's disease virus infection of chickens differing in resistance to Marek's disease.

Authors:  Pete Kaiser; Greg Underwood; Fred Davison
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Persistence of Marek's disease virus in a subpopulation of B cells that is transformed by avian leukosis virus, but not in normal bursal B cells.

Authors:  E Fynan; T M Block; J DuHadaway; W Olson; D L Ewert
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Recombinant Marek's disease virus (MDV)-derived lymphoblastoid cell lines: regulation of a marker gene within the context of the MDV genome.

Authors:  M S Parcells; R L Dienglewicz; A S Anderson; R W Morgan
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Cultivation of avian rotaviruses in chicken lymphocytes and lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Authors:  K A Schat; T J Myers
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.574

5.  Role of the short telomeric repeat region in Marek's disease virus replication, genomic integration, and lymphomagenesis.

Authors:  Annachiara Greco; Nadine Fester; Annemarie T Engel; Benedikt B Kaufer
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Multiple alternative splicing to exons II and III of viral interleukin-8 (vIL-8) in the Marek's disease virus genome: the importance of vIL-8 exon I.

Authors:  Keith William Jarosinski; Karel Antoni Schat
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 2.332

7.  Analysis of transcriptional activities of the Meq proteins present in highly virulent Marek's disease virus strains, RB1B and Md5.

Authors:  Shiro Murata; Tsukasa Okada; Rika Kano; Yuko Hayashi; Tomoyuki Hashiguchi; Misao Onuma; Satoru Konnai; Kazuhiko Ohashi
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.332

8.  Transformation of T-lymphocyte subsets by Marek's disease herpesvirus.

Authors:  K A Schat; C L Chen; B W Calnek; D Char
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Impact of deletions within the Bam HI-L fragment of attenuated Marek's disease virus on vIL-8 expression and the newly identified transcript of open reading frame LORF4.

Authors:  Keith William Jarosinski; Priscilla Helene O'Connell; Karel Antoni Schat
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.332

10.  Status of Marek's disease virus in established lymphoma cell lines: herpesvirus integration is common.

Authors:  H J Delecluse; W Hammerschmidt
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.