Literature DB >> 6303884

Sensitivity of single-contrast radiology in esophageal disease: a study of 240 patients with endoscopically verified abnormality.

D J Ott, D W Gelfand, W C Wu.   

Abstract

Single-contrast radiology of the esophagus was correlated with endoscopy in 240 patients with the following endoscopically verified abnormalities: esophagitis 170, rings 28, malignancies 19, varices 9, miscellaneous 14. For all the abnormalities except mild esophagitis, the overall sensitivity of the radiology in these 240 patients was 92%. All 19 cancers were diagnosed radiologically, whereas 90% of moderate and severe esophagitis was detected. The single-contrast examination thus reliably identified clinically significant disease of the esophagus. Comparison of these results to recent reports employing double-contrast technique suggests that claims of superiority for the double-contrast esophagram over the single-contrast study are not supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6303884     DOI: 10.1007/bf01948100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  28 in total

1.  Double-contrast examination of the esophagus.

Authors:  H M Goldstein; G D Dodd
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1976

2.  A comparative double-blind study of esophageal barium pastes.

Authors:  R E Miller; S M Chernish; R L Brunelle
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1977-10-25

3.  The routine air-contrast examination of the esophagus.

Authors:  J Skucas; W W Schrank
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Diffuse finely nodular lesions of the esophagus.

Authors:  Y Itai; T Kogure; Y Okuyama; H Akiyama
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Herpes esophagitis: a case studied by air-contrast esophagography.

Authors:  J Skucas; W W Schrank; P C Meyers; C S Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Routine air-contrast esophagography during upper gastrointestinal examinations.

Authors:  D M Balfe; R E Koehler; P J Weyman; R L Baron; W R Reinus
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Diagnosis of early esophageal cancer.

Authors:  H Suzuki; S Kobayashi; M Endo; K Nakayama
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Optimal visualization of esophageal varices.

Authors:  E M Cockerill; R E Miller; S M Chernish; G C McLaughlin; B E Rodda
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Cimetidine in the treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: a double blind controlled trial.

Authors:  J Behar; D L Brand; F C Brown; D O Castell; S Cohen; R J Crossley; C E Pope; C S Winans
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Reflux esophagitis revisited: prospective analysis of radiologic accuracy.

Authors:  D J Ott; W C Wu; D W Gelfand
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1981-01-15
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A rational clinical approach to esophageal motor disorders.

Authors:  J A DiPalma; G W Meyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Is a barium swallow complementary to endoscopy essential in the preoperative assessment of laparoscopic antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery?

Authors:  Georg R Linke; Jan Borovicka; Philipp Schneider; Andreas Zerz; Rene Warschkow; Jochen Lange; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.