Literature DB >> 630221

Firm, patient, and process variables associated with length of stay in four diseases.

L C Fernow, I McColl, C Mackie.   

Abstract

Factors associated with length of stay in three London teaching hospitals during 1972 and 1975 were examined in patients treated for myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, inguinal hernia without obstruction, and gall stones. Statistical analyses were carried out with multiple regressions on log lengths of stay.Increased length of stay was associated with infection in all four groups and with the seriousness of operative procedures in all but patients with cerebrovascular disease. Although age was a significant variable in patients with hernias and gall stones, it had relatively little practical effect on length of stay. Other significant variables in at least one disease were obesity, number of abnormalities in blood chemistry, administration of parenteral fluids or oxygen, or use of monitoring devices, and whether chest radiography was carried out, blood electrolytes and urea were measured, or anticoagulants were used. Patients with cerebrovascular disease who were not discharged to their own homes stayed on average more than two and a half times longer than other patients.Between a third and a half of the variance was explained by these variables and the variation among firms. The method described is reproducible in other hospital settings, and the study shows that much new information could be available routinely without mounting expensive field trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 630221      PMCID: PMC1603229          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6112.556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  8 in total

1.  Effects of age on length of hospital stay in a low-income population.

Authors:  J R Posner; H W Lin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Clinical styles and motivation: a study of laboratory test use.

Authors:  D F Hardwick; P Vertinsky; R T Barth; V F Mitchell; M Bernstein; I Vertinsky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  HOW LONG IN HOSPITAL?A STUDY IN VARIATION IN DURATION OF STAY FOR TWO COMMON SURGICAL CONDITIONS.

Authors:  M A HEASMAN
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1964-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Course of patients discharged early after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A D Gelson; P H Carson; H H Tucker; R Phillips; M Clarke; G D Oakley
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-06-26

5.  Coronary care for myocardial infarction in diabetics.

Authors:  N G Soler; B L Pentecost; M A Bennett; M G FitzGerald; P Lamb; J M Malins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-03-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Evaluating the quality of medical care.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1966-07

7.  Inpatient management: variations in some aspects of practice in Scotland.

Authors:  M A Heasman; V Carstairs
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-02-27

8.  Length of stay.

Authors:  J E Simpson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-03-05       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Variations in lengths of stay and rates of day case surgery: implications for the efficiency of surgical management.

Authors:  M Morgan; R Beech
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  What's in a waiting list?

Authors:  H F Sanderson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-11-06

3.  Prognosis in myocardial infarction--the benefits of exercise as seen in non-randomised trials.

Authors:  R J Shephard; T Kavanagh; J Kennedy; S Qureshi
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 13.800

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.