Literature DB >> 6297416

The value of needle renal allograft biopsy. I. A retrospective study of biopsies performed during putative rejection episodes.

A J Matas, R Sibley, M Mauer, D E Sutherland, R L Simmons, J S Najarian.   

Abstract

Following renal transplantation, immunosuppression is usually increased to treat presumed rejection episodes. However, a) many conditions mimic rejection in the post-transplant period, and b) many rejection episodes are irreversible. As increased immunosuppressive therapy is associated with an increased risk of infection, it would be ideal to limit antirejection therapy to only the rejection episodes that are reversible. The role of percutaneous allograft biopsy was studied as an aid to decide which patients to treat for rejection, to limit unnecessary immunosuppression and to predict allograft survival. One hundred thirty-five patients with suspected rejection underwent 206 allograft biopsies without complication. Two hundred four biopsies were available for study. Biopsies were coded on a 1-4 scale (minimal, mild, moderate, severe) for acute and chronic tubulointerstitial infiltrate and vascular rejection, as well as no rejection (e.g., recurrence of original disease). Treatment decisions were made on the basis of the biopsy combined with clinical data. All patients have been followed two years and outcome correlated with biopsy findings (death, nephrectomy, and return to dialysis defined as kidney loss). The results were the following: 1) biopsies represented changes within the kidney. Of 16 kidneys removed within one month of biopsy, no nephrectomy specimen showed less rejection than that seen on biopsy. 2) Eighty-one biopsies (39.7%) led to tapering or not increasing immunosuppression (either no rejection, minimal rejection, or irreversible changes). 3) Kidneys having either severe acute or chronic vascular rejection (less than 30% function at three months) had significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased survival three to 24 months postbiopsy than those with minimal or mild vascular rejection or tubulointerstitial infiltrate (83% function at three months). 4) Kidneys with moderate chronic vascular rejection and those with severe acute tubulointerstitial infiltrate had significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased survival at six to 24 months. 5) Kidneys with moderate chronic vascular rejection (MCV) without an acute infiltrate (ATI) had significantly better survival than those having both MCV and ATI. 6) Similarly, kidneys having severe ATI alone had better survival than those with ATI plus vascular rejection. It was concluded that a) percutaneous allograft biopsy can be done without graft loss or infection; b) biopsy represents changes throughout the kidney; c) biopsy aids in deciding when to treat for rejection and in deciding when to withhold increased immunosuppression, and d) allograft biopsy predicts the outcome of treatment of a rejection episode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6297416      PMCID: PMC1353114          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198302000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Letter: Increased serum creatinine resulting from hyperglycemia, mimicking transplant rejection.

Authors:  A J Matas; R L Simmons; F C Goetz; C M Kjellstrand; J S Najarian
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Recent advances in clinical and experimental transplantation.

Authors:  F T Rapaport; J M Converse; R E Billingham
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Renal allograft biopsy: a satisfactory adjunct for predicting renal function after graft rejection.

Authors:  A C Hsu; G S Arbus; E Noriega; J Huber
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 0.975

4.  Pseudorejection: factors mimicking rejection in renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  A J Matas; R L Simmons; C M Kjellstrand; J S Najarian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Influence of rejection therapy on fungal and nocardial infections in renal-transplant recipients.

Authors:  M C Bach; J L Adler; J Breman; F K P'eng; A Sahyoun; R M Schlesinger; P Madras; A P Monaco
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Improved patient survival in renal transplantation.

Authors:  O Salvatierra; D Potter; K C Cochrum; W J Amend; R Duca; B L Sachs; R W Johnson; F O Belzer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  A simplified method of percutaneous allograft biopsy.

Authors:  T J Buselmeier; R M Schauer; S M Mauer; F C Goetz; R L Simmons; J S Najarian; C M Kjellstrand
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

8.  The use of antilymphoblast globulin in the treatment of renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  R J Howard; R M Condie; D E Sutherland; R L Simmons; J S Najarian
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Kidney transplant biopsies in the diagnosis and management of acute rejection reactions.

Authors:  F O Finkelstein; N J Siegel; C Bastl; J N Forrest; M Kashgarian
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Glomerulopathy associated with cytomegalovirus viremia in renal allografts.

Authors:  W P Richardson; R B Colvin; S H Cheeseman; N E Tolkoff-Rubin; J T Herrin; A B Cosimi; A B Collins; M S Hirsch; R T McCluskey; P S Russell; R H Rubin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  What is the best way to diagnose renal allograft rejection in the small child?

Authors:  T E Bunchman; S M Mauer
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 2.  Recent advances in the immunology of xenotransplantation.

Authors:  T Takahashi; S Saadi; J L Platt
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.829

3.  Reassessing the Significance of Intimal Arteritis in Kidney Transplant Biopsy Specimens.

Authors:  Israel D R Salazar; Maribel Merino López; Jessica Chang; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Retrospective study of histological features of acute rejection in renal allografts and comparison with circulating T cell populations.

Authors:  J Wyatt; S R Aparicio; P Guillou
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Manifestations of renal allograft rejection in small children receiving adult kidneys.

Authors:  T E Bunchman; D S Fryd; R K Sibley; S M Mauer
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Renal allograft rejection in children and young adults: the Banff classification.

Authors:  H E Corey; S M Greenstein; V Tellis; R Schechner; I Greifer; B Bennett
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Renal transplantation: experience in Australia.

Authors:  Golam Muin Uddin; Elisabeth M Hodson
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome following renal transplantation for congenital nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  P H Lane; H W Schnaper; R L Vernier; T E Bunchman
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Causes of kidney allograft loss in a large pediatric population at a single center.

Authors:  B M Chavers; E M Kim; A J Matas; K J Gillingham; J S Najarian; S M Mauer
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Characteristics of cadaveric renal allograft recipients developing chronic rejection.

Authors:  M C Foster; P A Rowe; M J Dennis; A G Morgan; R P Burden; R W Blamey
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.