Literature DB >> 6297390

Recovery of viruses from vegetable surfaces.

B K Ward, C M Chenoweth, L G Irving.   

Abstract

The efficiency of a system developed for the recovery of viruses contaminating large quantities of vegetables was investigated in the laboratory and tested in the field. Viruses seeded onto a number of leafy vegetables in the laboratory were eluted with a phosphate-buffered saline solution (pH 9.0). The eluate was clarified by glass wool filtration, and any viruses present were concentrated by adsorption to a Filterite pleated cartridge filter, eluted with 3% beef extract (pH 9.0), and further concentrated by organic flocculation. At least 24 liters of vegetable eluate could be concentrated to 70 to 80 ml, equivalent to a greater than 99.5% reduction in volume. With this system, poliovirus was recovered with a mean efficiency of 58% for all vegetables tested. Adenovirus was recovered from lettuce with a slightly lower mean efficiency (55%). Poliovirus was recovered from large quantities of cabbage for up to 5 days in the field after spray irrigation of relatively low levels of virus, even when heavy rain fell before sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6297390      PMCID: PMC242201          DOI: 10.1128/aem.44.6.1389-1394.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  18 in total

1.  Association of enteroviruses with natural and artificially introduced colloidal solids in water and infectivity of solids-associated virions.

Authors:  S A Schaub; B P Sagik
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-08

2.  Adenovirus type 4 in Melbourne, 1969-1971.

Authors:  A W Ellis; G T McKinnon; F A Lewis; I D Gust
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1974-02-16       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  BGM, a continuous cell line more sensitive than primary rhesus and African green kidney cells for the recovery of viruses from water.

Authors:  D R Dahling; G Berg; D Berman
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1974-10

4.  Comparison of methods for the recovery of virus inoculated into ground beef.

Authors:  J T Tierney; R Sullivan; E P Larkin; J T Peeler
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-10

5.  Filtration methods for recovering enteroviruses from foods.

Authors:  K D Kostenbader; D O Cliver
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-08

6.  Enterovirus recovery with vegetable floc.

Authors:  J Konowalchuk; J I Speirs
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-10

7.  Viral aggregation resulting in the failure to correctly identify an unknown rhinovirus.

Authors:  J M Gwaltney; A M Calhoun
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-09

8.  Methods for detecting food-borne enteroviruses.

Authors:  J E Herrmann; D O Cliver
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1968-10

9.  Proteins of the group B arbovirus Kunjin.

Authors:  E G Westaway; B M Reedman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Comparison of rhinovirus-sensitive HeLa cells and human embryo fibroblasts for isolation of rhinoviruses from patients with respiratory disease.

Authors:  F A Lewis; M L Kennett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  3 in total

1.  Procedure for rapid concentration and detection of enteric viruses from berries and vegetables.

Authors:  S Butot; T Putallaz; G Sánchez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Foodborne viruses and fresh produce.

Authors:  I J Seymour; H Appleton
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Survival of Respiratory Viruses on Fresh Produce.

Authors:  M Susana Yépiz-Gómez; Charles P Gerba; Kelly R Bright
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.778

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.