| Literature DB >> 6285012 |
W Cates, K F Schulz, D A Grimes, A J Horowitz, F A Lyon, F H Kravitz, M J Frisch.
Abstract
Some clinicians have hesitated to perform dilatation and evacuation (D & E) procedures at 13 weeks' gestation or later because D & Es are more difficult to perform safely than suction-curettage procedures. Moreover, many clinicians still believe all second-trimester abortion procedures should be performed in a hospital. To evaluate these concerns, we analyzed 24,664 abortion performed between 1973 and 1978 by four physicians associated with a large outpatient abortion facility; 3,711 (15%) of the abortions were second-trimester procedures. Dilatation and evacuation was associated with a lower rate of serious complications per 100 procedures (0.23) than instillation of either dinoprost (prostaglandin F2 alpha) (1.28) or hypertonic saline (2.26). In addition, D & E had lower rates for most other specific complications. We conclude that D & E, while requiring more operator skill than earlier suction-curettage procedures, can be learned by gynecologists familiar with suction-curettage, can be performed more safely than the alternative instillation procedures, and can be safely practiced in selected ambulatory settings.Entities:
Keywords: Abortion, Drug Induced--complications; Abortion, Induced; Abortion, Saline Solution--complications; Americas; Comparative Studies; Curettage--complications; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Family Planning Personnel; Fertility Control, Postconception; Hospitals; Minnesota; North America; Northern America; Obstetrical Surgery; Physicians; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Second Trimester; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Studies; Surgery; Treatment; United States; Vacuum Aspiration--complications
Mesh:
Year: 1982 PMID: 6285012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAMA ISSN: 0098-7484 Impact factor: 56.272