Literature DB >> 6282866

Receptor-dependent and receptor-independent degradation of low density lipoprotein in normal rabbits and in receptor-deficient mutant rabbits.

R C Pittman, T E Carew, A D Attie, J L Witztum, Y Watanabe, D Steinberg.   

Abstract

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) catabolism was studied using WHHL rabbits, an inbred strain deficient in LDL receptor activity and, thus, an animal model for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. WHHL and normal rabbits were injected with [14C]sucrose-LDL and the tissue sites of LDL degradation were determined 24 h later. On degradation of [14C]sucrose-LDL, the [14C]sucrose ligand remains trapped within tissues as a cumulative measure of degradation. The fractional catabolic rate of [14C]sucrose-LDL in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits was reduced (0.024 +/- 0.010 versus 0.063 +/- 0.026 h-1) but, by virtue of the increased plasma pool, total LDL flux was increased (33.5 +/- 9.6 versus 10.6 +/- 4.4 mg of LDL protein/kg/day). Liver was the predominant site of catabolism in both WHHL and normal rabbits (52.7 +/- 6.9 and 56.6 +/- 6.2% of total degradation). About 90% of hepatic catabolism was attributable to parenchymal cells in both cases. Thus, Kupffer cells, a major component of the reticuloendothelial system, do not play a major role in LDL catabolism in WHHL rabbits. Despite receptor deficiency, the relative contribution of various tissues to overall LDL degradation was not greatly altered and the absolute rate of delivery of LDL to all tissues was increased with the exception of the adrenal. Thus, there was no evidence that the increased degradation occurred in any special subset of "scavenger" cells. Nevertheless, local scavenger cell uptake may be critically important, especially in atherogenesis. If it is assumed that receptor-independent degradation occurs at the same rate in the tissues of WHHL and normal rabbits and that catabolism in the absence of receptors is a linear function of concentration, then one can estimate the fraction of uptake in normal tissues mediated by receptors. The difference in the fraction of the plasma LDL pool cleared per unit of time in normal and WHHL rabbits would reflect the contribution of receptors to fractional clearance. By this calculation, receptor-mediated degradation in normal rabbits was 62% overall, 63% in liver, 92% in adrenal, and 83% in gut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6282866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  45 in total

1.  Temporary amelioration of hyperlipidemia in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient rabbits transplanted with genetically modified hepatocytes.

Authors:  J M Wilson; N R Chowdhury; M Grossman; R Wajsman; A Epstein; R C Mulligan; J R Chowdhury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The human asialoglycoprotein receptor is a possible binding site for low-density lipoproteins and chylomicron remnants.

Authors:  E Windler; J Greeve; B Levkau; V Kolb-Bachofen; W Daerr; H Greten
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Probing of the expression of the low-density lipoprotein receptor in vivo using an anti-receptor monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  E Gherardi; D E Bowyer; C Fitzsimmons; T Le Cras; A Hutchings; G Butcher
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Interaction of low density lipoproteins with liver cells in rainbow trout.

Authors:  T Gjøen; T Berg
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.794

5.  Membrane cholesterol modulates the fluid shear stress response of polymorphonuclear leukocytes via its effects on membrane fluidity.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhang; Jonathan Hurng; Debra L Rateri; Alan Daugherty; Geert W Schmid-Schönbein; Hainsworth Y Shin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.249

6.  Low-density-lipoprotein receptors in different rabbit liver cells.

Authors:  M S Nenseter; O Myklebost; R Blomhoff; C A Drevon; A Nilsson; K R Norum; T Berg
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1989-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Receptor-independent low density lipoprotein transport in the rat in vivo. Quantitation, characterization, and metabolic consequences.

Authors:  D K Spady; S D Turley; J M Dietschy
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Metabolism of low density lipoproteins in rainbow trout.

Authors:  T Gjøen; T Berg
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.794

9.  Characterization of hepatic low density lipoprotein binding and cholesterol metabolism in normal and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemic subjects.

Authors:  J M Hoeg; S J Demosky; E J Schaefer; T E Starzl; H B Brewer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Use of monoclonal anti-receptor antibodies to probe the expression of the low density lipoprotein receptor in tissues of normal and Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits.

Authors:  M Huettinger; W J Schneider; Y K Ho; J L Goldstein; M S Brown
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.