Literature DB >> 628059

How physicians use laboratory tests.

L P Skendzel.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to measure the ways in which a physician perceives and reacts to a laboratory result. After reviewing a series of brief clinical problems, physicians were asked to indicate the change in test results that would alter the diagnosis or treatment. Although there were wide differences in attitudes, the pattern of responses from 125 internists offered estimates of what is a clinically important change. In selected clinical settings, the change in successive measurements chosen with the greatest frequency as indicators of a clinically important change in level were glucose, 35 mg/dl; BUN, 6 mg/dl; serum sodium, 4 to 6 mEq/liter; serum potassium, 4 to 6 mEq/liter; uric acid, 8 mg/dl; creatinine, 0.4 mg/dl; serum calcium, 4 to 5 mg/dl; triglycerides, 20 mg/dl; hemoglobin, 1 g/dl; and serum osmolality, 11 mOsm/kg. The responses were compared with estimates of laboratory precision drawn from a national quality control program. The quality of laboratory testing was rated as satisfactory for clinical use in four of five clinical settings. The study points out the need to correlate the activities in the clinical laboratory with the application of test results in the care of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 628059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  4 in total

1.  Quality leadership and quality control.

Authors:  Tony Badrick
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2003-08

2.  Analytical goals in clinical biochemistry.

Authors:  W E Elion-Gerritzen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Risk of hypercalcemia in blacks taking hydrochlorothiazide and vitamin D.

Authors:  Paulette D Chandler; Jamil B Scott; Bettina F Drake; Kimmie Ng; John P Forman; Andrew T Chan; Gary G Bennett; Bruce W Hollis; Edward L Giovannucci; Karen M Emmons; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Evolving approaches to management of quality in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  R C Bartlett; M Mazens-Sullivan; J Z Tetreault; S Lobel; J Nivard
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 26.132

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.