Literature DB >> 627848

Functional representations common to visual perception and imagination.

P Podgorny, R N Shepard.   

Abstract

Subjects determined whether probe dots appearing in component squares of a 5 X 5 grid fell on a figure that, depending on the condition, was (a) visually presented as a pattern of darkened squares, (b) only remembered from a preceding presentation of such a pattern, or (c) imaginally generated from a verbal code. The speed and accuracy of the responses to the probes as well as the functional dependencies of the reaction times on structural variables were essentially the same whether the figural pattern was imagined, remembered, or actually seen. Reaction times averaged between 400 and 500 msec and were consistently faster (a) for on-figure than for off-figure responses, (b) for simpler figures that had fewer squares, (c) for off-figure probes that were more distant from the figure, and (d) for on-figure probes that consisted either of more dots on the figure or of a dot at the intersection of a horizontal and a vertical bar. The reults were consistent with a model in which a subject's perceptual or imaginal representations of these forms contain barlike units that respond independently to the probes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 627848     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.4.1.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

Review 1.  If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question?

Authors:  S M Kosslyn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Comparison processes on visual mental images.

Authors:  S Bagnara; F Simion; M E Tagliabue; C Umiltà
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-03

3.  Serial search and comparison of features of imagined and perceived objects.

Authors:  L M Parsons
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-01

4.  Attentional distraction, μ-suppression and empathic perspective-taking.

Authors:  C Chad Woodruff; Shelley Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Word and picture identification: is representational parsimony possible?

Authors:  K Kirsner; D Milech; V Stumpfel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-09

6.  Apparent equivalence between perception and imagery in the production of various visual illusions.

Authors:  B Wallace
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-03

7.  Memory for forms: common memory formats for verbal and visual stimulus presentations.

Authors:  G L Murphy; J W Hutchinson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-01

8.  Imagery effects on early visual processing.

Authors:  G Rhodes; A O'Leary
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

9.  The influence of imagery ability on color aftereffects produced by physically present and imagined induction stimuli.

Authors:  J Broerse; B Crassini
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-12

10.  Common processing constraints for visuomotor and visual mental rotations.

Authors:  G Pellizzer; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.