Literature DB >> 6271011

Are female sex hormones teratogenic?

J G Wilson, R L Brent.   

Abstract

An analysis of available epidemiologic data leads the present reviewers to conclude that the use of exogenous hormones during human pregnancy has not been proved to cause developmental abnormality in nongenital organs and tissues. This conclusion is further supported by the animal laboratory data. The preponderance of evidence at this writing indicates a lack of causal association between hormonal use during pregnancy and nongenital malformation of the offspring. The quality of the epidemiologic data does not, at this time, permit a definitive conclusion that sex hormones during pregnancy may not, under as yet to be defined conditions, have some adverse effect on human prenatal development. If there are increased risks of nongenital malformations associated with the administration of certain sex steroids, the risks are very small, may not be causal, and are substantially below the spontaneous risk of malformations. In spite of the present degree of uncertainty, the clinical, epidemiologic, and laboratory data do permit the formulation of a rational approach to handling problems related to sex steroid usage and exposure in pregnant women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animals, Laboratory; Biology; Central Nervous System; Central Nervous System Effects; Congenital Abnormalities; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Diseases; Endocrine System; Estrogens; Family Planning; Heart Diseases; Hormones--history; Hormones--side effects; Literature Review; Neonatal Diseases And Abnormalities; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Physiology; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Tests; Prospective Studies; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Retrospective Studies; Studies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6271011     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)33279-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Teratogenic risk of drugs used in early pregnancy.

Authors:  J Ruedy
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Environmental teratogens.

Authors:  R L Brent; D A Beckman
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Sara J Newmann; David A Grimes; Kavita Nanda; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

Review 4.  Evaluation of the reproductive and developmental risks of caffeine.

Authors:  Robert L Brent; Mildred S Christian; Robert M Diener
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-02

Review 5.  Prenatal adverse effects of various drugs and chemicals. A review of substances of frequent concern to mothers in the community.

Authors:  M Bologa-Campeanu; G Koren; M Rieder; M McGuigan
Journal:  Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug

6.  Documentation of contraception and pregnancy when prescribing potentially teratogenic medications for reproductive-age women.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Debbie A Postlethwaite; Yun-Yi Hung; Mary Anne Armstrong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Parental reproductive problems and gestational hormonal exposure in autistic and schizophrenic children.

Authors:  S J Funderburk; J Carter; P Tanguay; B J Freeman; J R Westlake
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1983-09

8.  Results of in vivo and in vitro studies for assessing prenatal toxicity.

Authors:  D Neubert; G Blankenburg; I Chahoud; G Franz; R Herken; M Kastner; S Klug; J Kröger; R Krowke; C Lewandowski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.