Literature DB >> 6268263

Subclinical infectious bursal disease in commercial broiler flocks in Saskatchewan.

L D Armstrong, H Tabel, C Riddell.   

Abstract

Five commercial broiler flocks, not vaccinated for infectious bursal disease virus, derived from infectious bursal disease virus-vaccinated breeder flocks were surveyed for evidence of bursal damage and infectious bursal disease virus infection. They were compared with two groups of birds raised in isolation. Serum samples from one day old chicks contained maternal anti-infectious bursal disease virus antibodies which declined to undetectable levels by four weeks of age. Serum antibody levels remained undetectable in both control groups and one commercial flock, whereas four of the five commercial flocks had actively produced anti-infectious bursal disease virus antibodies by slaughter age. The weight of bursae from infectious bursal disease virus-positive flocks declined as compared to controls after four weeks of age. The decline in weight correlated with the appearance of histopathological lesions. Infectious bursal disease virus antigen was demonstrated in selected infected bursae and infectious bursal disease bursae and infectious bursal disease virus was isolated from some of these damaged bursae. Clinical infectious bursal disease was not observed in any of the commercial flocks. The importance of subclinical bursal damage and immunosuppression is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6268263      PMCID: PMC1320116     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Comp Med        ISSN: 0008-4050


  16 in total

1.  Virus-neutralization versus agar-gel precipitin tests for detecting serological response to infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  J Weisman; S B Hitchner
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1978 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.577

2.  Persistence of parental infectious bursal disease antibody and its effect on susceptibility of young chickens.

Authors:  S B Hitchner
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1971 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.577

3.  Immunity response to the infectious bursal agent.

Authors:  R W Winterfield
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.577

4.  On establishing reference values.

Authors:  J H Lumsden; K Mullen
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1978-07

5.  Significance of bursa of Fabricius as target organ in infectious bursal disease of chickens.

Authors:  I Käufer; E Weiss
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Identification of the infectious bursal disease virus in Mexico.

Authors:  B Lucio; A Antillón; P Fernández
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1972 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.577

7.  Characterization of Immunosuppression in chickens by infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  K Hirai; K Kunihiro; S Shimakura
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1979 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.577

8.  Studies on the pathogenesis of Gumboro disease in the bursa of Fabricius, spleen, and thymus of the chicken.

Authors:  N F Cheville
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Specific B lymphocyte suppression by infectious bursal agent (Gumboro disease virus) in chickens.

Authors:  L Hudson; M Pattison; N Thantrey
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Effects of early infectious bursal disease virus infection on immunity to Newcastle disease in adult chickens.

Authors:  J J Giambrone
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence of subclinical infectious bursal disease and its significance in India.

Authors:  K C Singh; R G Dhawedkar
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Newcastle disease in a vaccinated flock which had experienced subclinical infectious bursal disease.

Authors:  J O Okoye; S V Shoyinka
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 1.559

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.