Literature DB >> 6255

Adverse drug reactions during treatment of hypertension.

G S Kellaway.   

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can be broadly classified as either "a nuisance" or "life-threatening". Voluntary reporting systems gradually accumulate a quite impressive list of suspected ADRs with antihypertensive drugs as their use becomes widespread. Such data gives no clue to true or relative incidence. The absolute and comparative incidence of ADRs can only be determined fairly by a system of unbiased general data collection of ADRs from which the data for antihypertensive drugs is then selected. The Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program provides such a source of information. Data from the Boston Program reveals that most of the listed ADRs with antihypertensive drugs occur very infrequently, that "nuisance" ADRs occur in 10 to 29% of patients in whom they are used, and that "life-threatening" ADRs occur in less than 1%. ADRs tend to discourage patient compliance with medication aims. In selecting specific antihypertensive therapy the clinician should be mindful not only of the severity of the hypertension to be treated, but also of the nature, type, and severity of potential ADRs, the personality and likely complicance of the patient, and the need for patient education regarding drug effects, possible unwanted effects, and what measures should be taken when ADRs occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 6255     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-197600111-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  4 in total

1.  Non-compliance and errors of drug administration in patients discharged from acute medical wards.

Authors:  G S Kellaway; E McCrae
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1975-06-11

2.  Incidence of a positive direct coombs test in patients on alpha-methyldopa.

Authors:  K C Carstairs; A Breckenridge; C T Dollery; S M Worlledge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1966-07-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Drug surveillance utilizing nurse monitors. An epidemiological approach.

Authors:  D Slone; H Jick; I Borda; T C Chalmers; M Feinleib; H Muench; L Lipworth; C Bellotti; B Gilman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1966-10-22       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Treatment of hypertension with methyldopa.

Authors:  P Johnson; A H Kitchin; C P Lowther; R W Turner
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1966-01-15
  4 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Prazosin: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension.

Authors:  R N Brogden; R C Heel; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Hypertension. The true incidence of side-effects.

Authors:  M F Hudson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract Occas Pap       Date:  1980-07

3.  Antihypertensive effect of diacetolol in essential hypertension.

Authors:  M Thibonnier; C Flabeau; M Thouvenin; A Roux; B Flouvat; P Pasquier; J Menard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Treating hypertension among inner-city dwellers: the problem of noncompliance.

Authors:  O A Isiadinso
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Effects of propranolol and metoprolol on haemodynamic and respiratory indices and on perceived exertion during exercise in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  C L van Herwaarden; R A Binkhorst; J F Fennis; A van't Laar
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1979-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.