Literature DB >> 6252602

Specimen damage considerations in biological microprobe analysis.

J Kirz.   

Abstract

In many biological materials radiation damage limits the resolution of the microanalytical measurement. To provide some perspective regarding the relative merits of different experimental arrangements, the dose to the specimen may be calculated using a simple model. While electron and proton probe X-ray microanalysis are found to involve heavy doses to the specimen, X-ray fluorescence, performed with a polarized, monochromatic X-ray probe, is the least destructive for the analysis of medium to heavy elements. For light elements (Z less than or equal to 20), electron energy loss spectroscopy or X-ray absorption microanalysis involve the lowest dose in most applications. Other advantages and limitations of the various techniques are also summarized.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6252602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scan Electron Microsc        ISSN: 0586-5581


  8 in total

1.  Alignment of low-dose X-ray fluorescence tomography images using differential phase contrast.

Authors:  Young Pyo Hong; Sophie-Charlotte Gleber; Thomas V O'Halloran; Emily L Que; Reiner Bleher; Stefan Vogt; Teresa K Woodruff; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.616

2.  Elemental analysis using differential absorption techniques.

Authors:  H Rarback; F Cinotti; C Jacobsen; J M Kenney; J Kirz; R Rosser
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Optimizing detector geometry for trace element mapping by X-ray fluorescence.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Sophie-Charlotte Gleber; Chris Jacobsen; Janos Kirz; Stefan Vogt
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Joint reconstruction of x-ray fluorescence and transmission tomography.

Authors:  Zichao Wendy Di; Si Chen; Young Pyo Hong; Chris Jacobsen; Sven Leyffer; Stefan M Wild
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Contact x-ray microscopy. A new technique for imaging cellular fine structure.

Authors:  L Beese; R Feder; D Sayre
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Relative merits and limiting factors for x-ray and electron microscopy of thick, hydrated organic materials.

Authors:  Ming Du; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  X-ray ptychographic and fluorescence microscopy of frozen-hydrated cells using continuous scanning.

Authors:  Junjing Deng; David J Vine; Si Chen; Qiaoling Jin; Youssef S G Nashed; Tom Peterka; Stefan Vogt; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  X-ray nanoprobes and diffraction-limited storage rings: opportunities and challenges of fluorescence tomography of biological specimens.

Authors:  Martin D de Jonge; Christopher G Ryan; Chris J Jacobsen
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.616

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.