Literature DB >> 6247124

Restriction endonuclease and molecular analyses of three rat genomes with special reference to chromosome rearrangement and speciation problems.

G L Miklos, D A Willcocks, P R Baverstock.   

Abstract

When differences are found between related species of organisms, it is often assumed that the differences themselves are causal factors either in speciation itself or in processes related to speciation. Two recent proposals on the functions of satellite DNA (Hatch et al., 1976 and Fry and Salser 1977) are that (a) large amounts of satellite DNA are important in facilitating chromosome rearrangements and hence cytogenetic evolution, and (b) satellite DNA differences between homologous chromosomes lead to pairing difficulties and are important in generating infertility barriers and hence speciation. If these proposals were to have some generality, one could expect organisms with very low amounts of highly repeated DNA to exhibit few chromosome rearrangements and to be evolutionarily conservative in a cytogenetic sense.--We have chosen two very closely related species of rat which are phenotypically almost indistinguishable and which have undergone massive genome reorganization. They differ by 11 major centric rearrangements (2n = 32, 2n = 50). We have characterised their genomes by restriction endonuclease digestions, thermal denaturations, analytical ultracentrifugations and reassociation techniques, and have found that they have virtually no highly repeated DNA. Thus the 11 major chromosomal rearrangements have been fixed in present day genomes with hardly any highly repeated DNA, centric or otherwise.--It appears therefore, that a large amount of highly repeated DNA is not obligatory for the formation and fixation of chromosome rearrangements. In addition, the existing literature reveals that one can find almost any situation at all, from species groups with high amounts of satellite DNA and no gross chromosomal rearrangements, to ones such as those described here, with tiny amounts of highly repeated DNA and massive chromosomal reorganisation. Since direct experimental data indicates that satellite DNA differences per se between homologous chromosomes do not cause infertility, speculations concerning modes of speciation based on satellite DNA differences between otherwise homologous chromosomes would appear to be ill founded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6247124     DOI: 10.1007/bf00327271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  36 in total

1.  High resolution thermal denaturation of DNA: thermalites of bacteriophage DNA.

Authors:  D L Vizard; A T Ansevin
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1976-02-24       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Interspersion and transcription of repeated sequences of rat DNA.

Authors:  S Szala; B Beiniek; J Michalska; M Choraźy
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1976-05-03

3.  Variation of C-bands in the chromosomes of several subspecies of Rattus rattus.

Authors:  T H Yosida; T Sagai
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  HindIII-sensitive sites present once in every four repeats of EcoRI-sensitive sites in Novikoff rat hepatoma DNA.

Authors:  M Fuke; H Busch
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1979-03-01       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 5.  Functional aspects of satellite DNA and heterochromatin.

Authors:  B John; G L Miklos
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1979

6.  The C- and G-banding patterns of Rattus norvegicus chromosomes.

Authors:  W Unakul; T C Hsu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The significance of the g-bands and c-bands of three different Robertsonian translocations of domestic sheep.

Authors:  A N Bruère; D L Zartman; H M Chapman
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1974

8.  Distribution of constitutive heterochromatin in mamallian chromosomes.

Authors:  T C Hsu; F E Arrighi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Karyotypic stability and speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila.

Authors:  H L Carson; F E Clayton; H D Stalker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Some properties of the single strands isolated from the DNA of the nuclear satellite of the mouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  W G Flamm; P M Walker; M McCallum
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1969-03-28       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  10 in total

1.  Repetitive DNA sequence homologies and amplifications in South American cricetid rodents.

Authors:  D Corach
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Asynchronous chromosome pairing in male meiosis of the rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  H Scherthan; I Schönborn
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Repetitive DNA sequences within and around the rat prolactin gene.

Authors:  J L Weber; L K Durrin; J Gorski
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  Nonstructural Chromosome Differentiation among Wheat Cultivars, with Special Reference to Differentiation of Chromosomes in Related Species.

Authors:  J Dvorák; P E McGuire
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Molecular and genetic studies on the euchromatin-heterochromatin transition region of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. 1. A cloned entry point near to the uncoordinated (unc) locus.

Authors:  G L Miklos; M J Healy; P Pain; A J Howells; R J Russell
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Comparative DNA analysis of three South American marsupials.

Authors:  A Heguy; H Musto; R Wettstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A familial insertion involving an active nucleolar organiser within chromosome 12.

Authors:  J L Watt; D A Couzin; D J Lloyd; G S Stephen; E McKay
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Genome evolution in pocket gophers (genus Thomomys). I. Heterochromatin variation and speciation potential.

Authors:  J L Patton; S W Sherwood
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Structure of the highly repeated, long interspersed DNA family (LINE or L1Rn) of the rat.

Authors:  E D'Ambrosio; S D Waitzkin; F R Witney; A Salemme; A V Furano
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  The DNA sequences of cloned complex satellite DNAs from Hawaiian Drosophila and their bearing on satellite DNA sequence conservation.

Authors:  G L Miklos; A C Gill
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.