Literature DB >> 6245896

Carticaine: action of the local anesthetic on myelinated nerve fibres.

U Borchard, H Drouin.   

Abstract

Unlike other clinically used local anesthetics, carticaine contains a thiophene ring. Current voltage relations of peak sodium current INa and steady state potassium current IK were measured in voltage clamp experiments on the node of Ranvier of Rana esculenta. The dependence of the maximum sodium conductance on external concnetration of carticaine is described by an apparent dissociation constant KNa = 0.065 mM at pH = 7.3. An apparent dissociation constant KK = 0.147 mM at pH = 7.3 was calculated on the basis of the action of carticaine on the maximum potassium conductance. Similar to other amine local anesthetics, carticaine blocks sodium channels at a lower concentration than potassium channels, but lower concentrations of the thiophene derivative than of the benzene derivatives are needed to block the ionic channels. The partition coefficients in-octanol/Soerensen buffer at pH = 7.35 follow the sequence lidocaine (46) more than carticaine (17) more than procaine (2). Therefore, the action of these local anesthetics on sodium channels and potassium channels seems not to follow mere lipid solubility properties of the neutral drug. Increasing the pH from 6.3 to 8.3 favoured the neutral drug form and enhanced the block of both ionic channels but the relative reduction of the ionic currents was larger for potassium currents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6245896     DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(80)90482-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0014-2999            Impact factor:   4.432


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches.

Authors:  D A Haas; D G Harper; M A Saso; E R Young
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

2.  Efficacy of Infiltration Anaesthesia of 4% Articaine HCl (buccal) Versus 2% Lignocaine HCl (buccolingual) in Extraction of Mandibular Premolars: A Single Centred, Randomised, Crossover Group Study.

Authors:  Ajit Joshi; Harleen Kaur Soni
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-10-01

3.  A Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy of 4% Articaine, 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lignocaine using a Single Buccal Supraperiosteal Injection for Maxillary Tooth Extraction.

Authors:  Deepak Chandrasekaran; Ravindran Chinnaswami; K Shanthi; A Emmanuel Dhiravia Sargunam; K Santhosh Kumar; Tharini Satheesh
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine.

Authors:  Anand Vijay Somuri; A Bhagavandas Rai; Manju Pillai
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-08-24

5.  A clinical study of efficacy of 4% articaine hydrochloride versus 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in dentistry.

Authors:  Dattatraya A Darawade; Santosh Kumar; Shilpa Budhiraja; Manoj Mittal; Tanvi N Mehta
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-09

6.  The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar Reddy Kolli; S V S G Nirmala; Sivakumar Nuvvula
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  State-dependent block of Na+ channels by articaine via the local anesthetic receptor.

Authors:  Ging Kuo Wang; Joanna Calderon; Shiow-Jiin Jaw; Sho-Ya Wang
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1st Molar.

Authors:  D Prasanna Kumar; Mandeep Sharma; Vinay Patil; Rohit Singh Subedar; G Vijaya Lakshmi; Nithin Varalakonda Manjunath
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.