Literature DB >> 6245554

Fine needle aspiration of breast carcinoma: a preliminary cytoprognostic study.

J Mouriquand, D Pasquier.   

Abstract

A cytologic grading method for fine needle aspiration smears was applied to 178 histologically confirmed breast carcinomas. Grade I defined a well-differentiated carcinoma, grade II a carcinoma with pleomorphic tumor cells and grade II an anaplastic carcinoma. The cell-to-cell relationship (topography) and the cytologic criteria contributed to the grading. Special attention was paid to grade III tumors, which have an unfavorable prognosis. The correlation of grading with the clinical course of the disease was evaluated after a 12-month followup. In 4% of the patients classified as having grade I disease, 8.9% as having grade II and 66% as having grade III, local recurrence of disease, metastasis or death was observed within one year. The contribution of cytologic grading to the prognosis of breast cancers is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6245554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  10 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous biopsies of the breast: state of the art.

Authors:  B D Fornage
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Fine needle aspiration cytology in lieu of open biopsy in management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  H J Wanebo; P S Feldman; M C Wilhelm; J L Covell; R L Binns
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Value of cytoprognostic classification in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  J Mouriquand; M Gozlan-Fior; D Villemain; Y Bouchet; J C Sage; M A Mermet; M Bolla
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparative evaluation of six cytological grading systems in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Kaushik Saha; Gargi Raychaudhuri; Bitan Kuamr Chattopadhyay; Indranil Das
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Cytological grading of breast cancers and comparative evaluation of two grading systems.

Authors:  Farooq Ahmed Wani; Subhash Bhardwaj; Dinesh Kumar; Pervez Katoch
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P Arul; Suresh Masilamani
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  A whole slide image-based machine learning approach to predict ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) recurrence risk.

Authors:  Sergey Klimov; Islam M Miligy; Arkadiusz Gertych; Yi Jiang; Michael S Toss; Padmashree Rida; Ian O Ellis; Andrew Green; Uma Krishnamurti; Emad A Rakha; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Comparison of 3-tier cytological grading systems for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Dinisha Einstien; B O Parijatham Omprakash; Hemalatha Ganapathy; Sadaf Rahman
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2014-03-12

9.  A comparative and evaluative study of two cytological grading systems in breast carcinoma with histological grading: an important prognostic factor.

Authors:  Pinki Pandey; Alok Dixit; Subrat Chandra; Swarn Kaur
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.916

10.  FNAC of Breast Lesions with Special Reference to IAC Standardized Reporting and Comparative Study of Cytohistological Grading of Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hemlata Panwar; Pooja Ingle; Tummidi Santosh; Vandita Singh; Amit Bugalia; Nighat Hussain
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 1.000

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.