Literature DB >> 6237902

The in vitro and in vivo activity of ciprofloxacin.

H J Zeiler, K Grohe.   

Abstract

The antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867) was compared with those of norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefaclor, sisomicin and cefotaxime in in vitro and mouse protection studies. Approximately 300 clinical isolates of clinically important gram-positive and gram-negative species were used. The median MICs of ciprofloxacin against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria ranged from less than or equal to 0.015-1 mg/l. Ciprofloxacin was 2-8 fold more active than norfloxacin and 100-fold more active than nalidixic acid. It also had a wider spectrum of activity against gram-positive organisms including even enterococci. No cross-resistance was observed between ciprofloxacin and beta-lactam antibiotics or aminoglycosides. Only acidic pH conditions decreased its activity. Ciprofloxacin showed rapid bactericidal action against organisms in both the logarithmic and stationary growth phases. In mouse protection studies (intraperitoneal infection) ciprofloxacin was significantly more effective than norfloxacin, ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and also showed excellent activity against Pseudomonas infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6237902     DOI: 10.1007/bf01977490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0722-2211            Impact factor:   3.267


  5 in total

1.  Pipemidic acid, a new antibacterial agent active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: in vitro properties.

Authors:  M Shimizu; Y Takase; S Nakamura; H Katae; A Minami
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro antibacterial activity of AM-715, a new nalidixic acid analog.

Authors:  A Ito; K Hirai; M Inoue; H Koga; S Suzue; T Irikura; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro and in vivo activity of DL-8280, a new oxazine derivative.

Authors:  K Sato; Y Matsuura; M Inoue; T Une; Y Osada; H Ogawa; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and nalidixic acid.

Authors:  A Bauernfeind; C Petermüller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  In vitro activity of Bay 09867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews; L J Edwards
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total
  41 in total

Review 1.  The mode of action of quinolones: the paradox in activity of low and high concentrations and activity in the anaerobic environment.

Authors:  C S Lewin; I Morrissey; J T Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Drug targeting by polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles is not efficient against persistent Salmonella.

Authors:  M E Page-Clisson; H Pinto-Alphandary; E Chachaty; P Couvreur; A Andremont
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  In vitro activities of new quinolones against Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  M Carbone; M T Fera; V Cecchetti; O Tabarrini; E Losi; V Cusumano; G Teti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro evaluation of A-56619 (difloxacin) and A-56620: new aryl-fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  J M Stamm; C W Hanson; D T Chu; R Bailer; C Vojtko; P B Fernandes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Concentration of ciprofloxacin in human serum, lung and pleural tissues and fluids during and after lung surgery.

Authors:  G Hopf; R Böcker; C J Estler; H J Radtke; W Floh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Ecotoxicological effects of ciprofloxacin on freshwater species: data integration and derivation of toxicity thresholds for risk assessment.

Authors:  N Martins; R Pereira; N Abrantes; J Pereira; F Gonçalves; C R Marques
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Identification of a pKM101 region which confers a slow growth rate and interferes with susceptibility to quinolone in Escherichia coli AB1157.

Authors:  B Clerch; E Rivera; M Llagostera
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  K Vance-Bryan; D R Guay; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  High risk of streptococcal septicemia after high dose cytosine arabinoside treatment for acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  W Kern; E Kurrle; E Vanek
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1987-08-17

10.  Interactions of ciprofloxacin with clindamycin, metronidazole, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and mezlocillin against gram-positive and gram-negative anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  J L Whiting; N Cheng; A W Chow
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.