Literature DB >> 6237662

Gynaecological laparoscopy: clinical experiences of two anaesthetic techniques.

F L Kurer, D B Welch.   

Abstract

Two anaesthetic techniques were assessed in 120 fit young women having non-emergency gynaecologial laparoscopy as in-patients. One group breathed halothane spontaneously via a face mask, and the second group were given neuromuscular blocking drugs and ventilation was controlled. There was no significant difference in intraoperative anaesthetic or surgical complications between the two groups although morbidity was greater in the intubated group when assessed 4 h after surgery. After 24 h there was no difference in postoperative morbidity. In an appendix to the study, 40 day-stay patients having the same operation under similar conditions were reviewed. After 24 h abdominal pain, lethargy and weakness were still present; 30% of the patients stated that they would prefer to be admitted overnight for a similar procedure in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6237662     DOI: 10.1093/bja/56.11.1207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  2 in total

1.  The workload of a purpose built day surgical unit.

Authors:  T W Ogg; P A Obey
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy wise?

Authors:  C J Saunders; B F Leary; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.