Literature DB >> 6235799

The assessment of response to therapy of bone metastases in breast cancer.

M A Rossleigh, F T Lovegrove, P M Reynolds, M J Byrne, B P Whitney.   

Abstract

Serial bone scans, x-rays and records of bone pain were reviewed in order to determine the relative contributions of these parameters in the assessment of response of bone metastases to treatment. Twenty-seven patients with abnormal bone scans due to metastatic breast cancer were studied. Ten of the patients showed an early temporary flare on bone scan including five with apparent new lesions. Confirmation that such new lesions did not denote progressive disease was provided by subsequent improvement in symptoms and reduction in intensity and number of lesions on a follow-up bone scan, without any change in systemic therapy. Serial x-rays were found to be unreliable as a sole method for assessing response to therapy or disease progression, as in only seven of the 27 patients could a definitive radiological assessment of response be made. In only one patient did x-rays improve the accuracy of the scan by distinguishing between a healing flare and progressive disease. In contrast, this distinction was made in seven of the 10 patients on the basis of improvement in bone pain at the time of the flare. The other 3 patients had no bone pain prior to therapy or at the time of the flare. Tentative response criteria incorporating bone scan, x-ray and symptoms are suggested. The criteria incorporate recognition of the fact that new lesions appearing on a bone scan within six months of initiation of therapy may comprise part of a healing flare response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6235799     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1984.tb03578.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Med        ISSN: 0004-8291


  7 in total

1.  The flare phenomenon: still learning after 35 years.

Authors:  Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry detects disease- and treatment-related alterations of bone density in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  G L Smith; A P Doherty; L M Banks; J Dutton; L W Hanham; T J Christmas; R J Epstein
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  The flare phenomenon: far from fair and square.

Authors:  W D van Schelven; E K Pauwels
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-05

4.  The diagnostic utility of the flare phenomenon on bone scintigraphy in staging prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gary J R Cook; Ram Venkitaraman; Aslam S Sohaib; Valerie J Lewington; Sue C Chua; Robert A Huddart; Christopher C Parker; David D Dearnaley; Alan Horwich
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Scintigraphic and radiographic patterns of skeletal metastases in breast cancer: value of sequential imaging in predicting outcome.

Authors:  M J Janicek; K Shaffer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Contemporary approaches for imaging skeletal metastasis.

Authors:  David Ulmert; Lilja Solnes; Daniel Lj Thorek
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 13.567

7.  Biochemical prediction of response of bone metastases to treatment.

Authors:  R E Coleman; K B Whitaker; D W Moss; G Mashiter; I Fogelman; R D Rubens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.