Literature DB >> 6230922

Sensitivity and specificity of commonly used electrocardiographic criteria for left atrial enlargement determined by M-mode echocardiography.

K Munuswamy, M A Alpert, R H Martin, R B Whiting, N J Mechlin.   

Abstract

To assess the sensitivity and specificity of 6 commonly used electrocardiographic criteria for left atrial (LA) enlargement, the rest ECGs of 99 patients in normal sinus rhythm were analyzed. Fifty-seven of the patients had LA enlargement and 42 had a normal LA dimension as determined by M-mode echocardiography. The 6 criteria studied and their respective sensitivities and specificities were as follows: (1) duration of the negative phase of the P wave in lead V1 greater than 40 ms: sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 80%; (2) notched P wave in any standard lead with an interpeak duration greater than 40 ms: sensitivity, 15%; specificity, 100%; (3) P terminal force (depth X duration of the terminal portion of the P wave) in lead V1 more negative than -0.04 mm X s: sensitivity, 69%; specificity 93%; (4) depth of the negative phase of the P wave in lead V1 greater than or equal to 1 mm: sensitivity, 60%; specificity, 93%; (5) total P-wave duration greater than 110 ms in any standard lead: sensitivity, 33%; specificity, 88%; (6) total P wave duration/P-R interval duration greater than 1.6: sensitivity, 31%; specificity, 64%. Combining 2 or more of these criteria did not substantially improve sensitivity and specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6230922     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90413-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  21 in total

1.  Usefulness of electrocardiographic parameters as compared with computed tomography measures of left atrial volume enlargement: from the ROMICAT trial.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Elizabeth M Charipar; Leon M Ptaszek; Carolyn Taylor; Joao D Fontes; Matthias Kriegel; Thomas Irlbeck; Amir A Mahabadi; Ron Blankstein; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Association of P-wave duration, dispersion, and terminal force in relation to P-wave axis among outpatients.

Authors:  Laxman Prajapat; Vignendra Ariyarajah; Mary E Frisella; Sirin Apiyasawat; David H Spodick
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  [The standard ECG: did its significance change?].

Authors:  G H von Knorre
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-12

4.  Abnormal P-wave morphology is a predictor of atrial fibrillation development and cardiac death in MADIT II patients.

Authors:  Fredrik Holmqvist; Pyotr G Platonov; Scott McNitt; Slava Polonsky; Jonas Carlson; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Prevalence of interatrial block in healthy school-aged children: definition by P-wave duration or morphological analysis.

Authors:  Polychronis Dilaveris; Leonidas Raftopoulos; Georgios Giannopoulos; Stylianos Katinakis; Dimitrios Maragiannis; Dimitrios Roussos; Konstantinos Gatzoulis; Andreas Michaelides; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Left atrial abnormality by electrocardiogram predicts left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography in the presence of right bundle-branch block.

Authors:  A Mehta; A C Jain; A P Morise; M C Mehta; M Billie
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Amplitude of the electrocardiographic QRS complexes during and after severe pulmonary edema.

Authors:  John E Madias
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  P-wave indices and atrial fibrillation: cross-cohort assessments from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) and Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  Jared W Magnani; Lei Zhu; Faye Lopez; Michael J Pencina; Sunil K Agarwal; Elsayed Z Soliman; Emelia J Benjamin; Alvaro Alonso
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Interatrial block: a novel risk factor for embolic stroke?

Authors:  Vignendra Ariyarajah; Puneet Puri; Sirin Apiyasawat; David H Spodick
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  P-wave morphology is unaffected by atrial size: a study in healthy athletes.

Authors:  Richard Petersson; Hilde M Berge; Gard F Gjerdalen; Jonas Carlson; Fredrik Holmqvist; Kjetil Steine; Pyotr G Platonov
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.