Literature DB >> 6229626

Differences in the effects of selenite and biological selenium on the chemical form and distribution of mercury after the simultaneous administration of HgCl2 and selenium to rats.

L Magos, T W Clarkson, A R Hudson.   

Abstract

The interaction was compared between inorganic (HgCl2) mercury and selenite (Na2SeO3) vs. the interaction between inorganic mercury and biological selenium (a freeze-dried preparation of liver from rats treated with selenite). Organ concentrations of selenium were always significantly lower after biological selenium than after selenite. Biological selenium affected the organ distribution of inorganic mercury differently than selenite. Furthermore, the speciation of mercury was affected by this form of selenium. A mercury-selenide compound (presumably HgSe) accounted for a greater proportion of total mercury in tissues after selenite than after a dose of biological selenium. Administration of selenomethionine had a similar effect on the speciation of mercury to that seen after biological selenium. As the forms of selenium in selenomethionine or selenium deposited in the liver are most likely nearer than selenite to selenium present in food, our results suggest that, as far as the reaction of mercury with selenide is concerned, experiments with selenite overestimate the protective effect of dietary selenium against inorganic mercury and possibly against methylmercury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6229626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  6 in total

1.  Mercury in blood cells-Altered elemental profiles : Toxic events in human exposure.

Authors:  E Johansson; U Lindh
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Selenium concentrations in brain after exposure to methylmercury: relations between the inorganic mercury fraction and selenium.

Authors:  L Björkman; K Mottet; M Nylander; M Vahter; B Lind; L Friberg
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Comparison of the protection given by selenite, selenomethionine and biological selenium against the renotoxicity of mercury.

Authors:  L Magos; T W Clarkson; S Sparrow; A R Hudson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 4.  The influence of nutrition on methyl mercury intoxication.

Authors:  L Chapman; H M Chan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Selenium Health Benefit Values: Updated Criteria for Mercury Risk Assessments.

Authors:  Nicholas V C Ralston; Carla R Ralston; Laura J Raymond
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Effects of simultaneous low-level dietary supplementation with inorganic and organic selenium on whole-body, blood, and organ levels of toxic metals in mice.

Authors:  O Andersen; J B Nielsen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.