Literature DB >> 6227305

Chronic low back pain: predicting response to nonsurgical treatment.

J A Turner, J Robinson, C P McCreary.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of several measures in predicting response to conservative treatment for chronic low back pain was studied. The measures included pretreatment demographic variables, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), patient ratings of pain caused by daily activities as measured by the Activities Discomfort Scale (ADS), and physician ratings. The subjects consisted of 135 patients treated at a university hospital back clinic who completed questionnaires six months or more after the initiation of treatment. The only significant predictor of how successful treatment had been in relieving pain was the MMPI hypochondriasis scale. The best predictor of patient-rated average pain intensity at follow-up was the ADS. Physicians' predictions of pain relief and return to normal activities, the ADS and the hypochondriasis scale each was associated significantly with patient ratings of return to normal activities after treatment, and to about the same extent. In general, statistical combinations of pretreatment variables did not increase the power of prediction. The ADS appears to be a promising predictor of patient-rated pain intensity after treatment, and may be useful in identifying poor risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6227305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  7 in total

Review 1.  The relevance of health anxiety to chronic pain: research findings and recommendations for assessment and treatment.

Authors:  Heather D Hadjistavropoulos; Thomas Hadjistavropoulos
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2003-04

2.  Prediction of return to work by rehabilitation professionals.

Authors:  C A Velozo; P J Lustman; D M Cole; J A Montag; B Eubanks
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-12

3.  Psychological factors related to health, back pain, and dysfunction.

Authors:  S J Linton; B Althoff; L Melin; A Lundin; L Bodin; A Mägi; K Lidström; T Lihagen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1994-03

4.  Responsiveness of depression and its influence on surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Asdrubal Falavigna; Orlando Righesso; Alisson Roberto Teles; Lucas Piccoli Conzati; Julia Bertholdo Bossardi; Pedro Guarise da Silva; Joseph S Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-22

5.  Occupational advice to help people return to work following lower limb arthroplasty: the OPAL intervention mapping study.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Carol Coole; Avril Drummond; Sayeed Khan; Catriona McDaid; Catherine Hewitt; Lucksy Kottam; Sarah Ronaldson; Elizabeth Coleman; David A McDonald; Fiona Nouri; Melanie Narayanasamy; Iain McNamara; Judith Fitch; Louise Thomson; Gerry Richardson; Amar Rangan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Role of depression after lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Lumir Hrabalek
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2011-09-26

7.  Evaluation of Dram Score as a Predictor of Poor Postoperative Outcome in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Serrano-García; Manuel Fernández-González; Jesús Betegón-Nicolás; Julio Villar-Pérez; Ana Lozano-Muñoz; José Hernández-Encinas; Ignacio Fernández-Bances; Marta Esteban-Blanco; Jesús Ángel Seco-Calvo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.