Literature DB >> 6226802

Comparison of the structures of cro and lambda repressor proteins from bacteriophage lambda.

D H Ohlendorf, W F Anderson, M Lewis, C O Pabo, B W Matthews.   

Abstract

The three-dimensional structures of cro repressor protein and of the amino-terminal domain of lambda repressor protein, both from bacteriophage lambda, are compared. The second and third alpha-helices, alpha 2 and alpha 3, are shown to have essentially identical conformations in the two proteins, confirming the significance of the amino acid sequence homology previously noted between these and other DNA binding proteins in the region corresponding to these helices. The correspondence between the two-helical units in cro and lambda repressor protein is better than the striking agreement noted previously between two-helical units in cro and catabolite gene-activator protein. Parts of the first alpha-helices of repressor and cro show a structural correspondence that suggests a revised sequence homology between the two proteins in their extreme amino-terminal regions. In particular, there is a short loop between the alpha 1 and alpha 2 helices of lambda repressor that is missing from cro. This structural difference may account for the observed differences found with different cros and repressors in the pattern of phosphates whose ethylation prevents the binding of these proteins to their specific recognition sites. Although the two proteins have strikingly similar alpha 2-alpha 3 helical units that are presumed to bind to DNA in an essentially similar manner, stereochemical restrictions prevent the alpha 2-alpha 3 units of the respective proteins aligning on the DNA in exactly the same way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6226802     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80169-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  20 in total

1.  Phage lambda Cro protein and cI repressor use two different patterns of specific protein-DNA interactions to achieve sequence specificity in vivo.

Authors:  N Benson; P Youderian
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Regulation of the glyoxylate bypass operon: cloning and characterization of iclR.

Authors:  A Sunnarborg; D Klumpp; T Chung; D C LaPorte
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Protein-DNA conformational changes in the crystal structure of a lambda Cro-operator complex.

Authors:  R G Brennan; S L Roderick; Y Takeda; B W Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How Cro and lambda-repressor distinguish between operators: the structural basis underlying a genetic switch.

Authors:  R A Albright; B W Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Modulation of the stability of a gene-regulatory protein dimer by DNA and cAMP.

Authors:  A M Brown; D M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dominant negative mutations in the Tn10 tet repressor: evidence for use of the conserved helix-turn-helix motif in DNA binding.

Authors:  P J Isackson; K P Bertrand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tn10 tet operator mutations affecting Tet repressor recognition.

Authors:  A Wissmann; I Meier; L V Wray; M Geissendörfer; W Hillen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-05-27       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Identification of amino acids essential for DNA binding and dimerization in p67SRF: implications for a novel DNA-binding motif.

Authors:  A D Sharrocks; H Gille; P E Shaw
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Molecular basis of DNA sequence recognition by the catabolite gene activator protein: detailed inferences from three mutations that alter DNA sequence specificity.

Authors:  R H Ebright; P Cossart; B Gicquel-Sanzey; J Beckwith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Model of specific complex between catabolite gene activator protein and B-DNA suggested by electrostatic complementarity.

Authors:  I T Weber; T A Steitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.