Literature DB >> 6226241

Pharmacokinetics of AT-2266 administered orally to mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys.

S Nakamura, N Kurobe, S Kashimoto, T Ohue, Y Takase, M Shimizu.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of AT-2266 (1-ethyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)-1,8-naphthyridine- 3-carboxylic acid) were studied in various experimental animals and compared in a number of aspects with those of norfloxacin. Both agents were administered orally. The mean peak plasma levels of AT-2266 in mice, rats, and dogs (given a single dose of 50 mg/kg for mice and rats and 25 mg/kg for dogs) were 2.39, 1.63, and 5.00 mug/ml, respectively, with elimination half-lives of 2.24, 2.81, and 5.76 h. The respective mean plasma levels of norfloxacin at similar dosages were 0.510, 0.410, and 0.700 mug/ml; elimination half-lives were 1.40, 2.35, and 6.06 h. In dogs repeatedly dosed with 25 mg of AT-2266 per kg every 12 h, the mean peak plasma levels after the third and fifth doses were about 1.4 times those after the first dose. The binding rates of AT-2266 and norfloxacin to plasma of mice, rats, and dogs and to human serum ranged from 27.6 to 40.2% and 39.8 to 44.2%, respectively. In rats receiving a single dose of 50 mg/kg, the respective mean peak levels of AT-2266 in plasma, lung, muscle, and kidney were 2.47, 4.60, 5.35, and 33.9 mug/ml or g, whereas those of norfloxacin were 0.234, 0.390, 0.272, and 2.05 mug/ml or g. AT-2266 was widely distributed in tissues of dogs and monkeys after repeated dosage. The respective 24-h recoveries of AT-2266 from urine of mice, rats, and dogs after single doses of 50, 50, and 25 mg/kg were 56.6, 40.5, and 64.1%, and recoveries of norfloxacin at these doses were 4.40, 2.91, and 5.34%. The respective 24-h recoveries of AT-2266 from bile and feces of rats given a single dose of 50 mg/kg were 2.47 and 52.7%. Bioautography of plasma and urine indicated that AT-2266 was metabolized to but a slight degree. The results indicate that AT-2266 is better than norfloxacin in oral absorption and similar to the latter in stability to metabolic inactivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6226241      PMCID: PMC185104          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.24.1.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  4 in total

1.  Comparative in vitro activity of Mk-0366 and other selected oral antimicrobial agents against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  M Y Khan; Y Siddiqui; R P Gruninger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro antibacterial activity of AM-715, a new nalidixic acid analog.

Authors:  A Ito; K Hirai; M Inoue; H Koga; S Suzue; T Irikura; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative in vitro activity of norfloxacin (MK-0366) and ten other oral antimicrobial agents against urinary bacterial isolates.

Authors:  M Y Khan; R P Gruninger; S M Nelson; R E Klicker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity of MK-0366 against clinical urinary pathogens including gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  J Downs; V T Andriole; J L Ryan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total
  22 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of a new quinolone, AM-833, in mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys.

Authors:  H Kusajima; N Ishikawa; M Machida; H Uchida; T Irikura
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vivo evaluation of NM441, a new thiazeto-quinoline derivative.

Authors:  M Ozaki; M Matsuda; Y Tomii; K Kimura; J Segawa; M Kitano; M Kise; K Shibata; M Otsuki; T Nishino
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacokinetics of a novel quinolone, AT-4140, in animals.

Authors:  S Nakamura; N Kurobe; T Ohue; M Hashimoto; M Shimizu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Tissue penetration of sparfloxacin in a rat model of experimental Escherichia coli epididymitis.

Authors:  M Ludwig; C A Jantos; S Wolf; M Bergmann; K Failing; H G Schiefer; W Weidner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  The effect of induced fever on the biokinetics of norfloxacin and its interaction with probenecid in goats.

Authors:  K Jha; B K Roy; R C Singh
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 6.  Enoxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  J M Henwood; J P Monk
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Effect of oral antacids on disposition of intravenous enoxacin.

Authors:  D E Nix; M E Lebsack; M Chapelsky; A J Sedman; J Busch; A Norman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative in vitro activities of enoxacin (CI-919, AT-2266) and eleven antipseudomonal agents against aminoglycoside-susceptible and -resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

Authors:  C M Bassey; A L Baltch; R P Smith; P E Conley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Enoxacin compared with cefoperazone for the treatment of experimental Enterobacter aerogenes endocarditis.

Authors:  J A Boscia; W D Kobasa; D Kaye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Absorption, distribution, metabolic fate, and elimination of pefloxacin mesylate in mice, rats, dogs, monkeys, and humans.

Authors:  G Montay; Y Goueffon; F Roquet
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.