Literature DB >> 622550

Testing toxic substances for protection of the environment.

S Draggan, J M Giddings.   

Abstract

The Toxic Substances Control Act requires pre-production testing of chemicals for potential hazards to human and environmental health. Effective control of chemicals requires evaluations of chemical hazard that go beyond determinations of toxicity to humans to include the effects, transport, and fat of chemicals in the environemnt. Formulation of meaningful hazard evaluations depends on integrating information from tests of chemical effects, transport, and fate or by developing testing tools that integrate these factors during experimentation. Chemical effects may be acute or chronic and they may be observed individual organisms, populations or organisms, or in total ecosystems. Chemical transport through the environment depends on physico-chemical characteristics of the chemical and the medium (soil, water, or air) as well as environmental factors and biotic processes. The ultimate fate of chemicals (persistence, transformation, or degradation) is determined by numerous physical and biological processes occurring in the environment, and must be acknowledged to effectively determine the hazard. Many techniques are available for the separate and routine evaluation of the effects, transport and fate of environmental contaminants. However, separate identification of the importance and magnitude of each of these factors limits their utility in assessments of chemical hazard. The microcosm (model ecosystem) method integrates many of these tests in replicable experimental units, and may provide substantial information on chemical hazard in ecosystem context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 622550     DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(78)90003-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  An argument for ecosystem level monitoring.

Authors:  B S Ausmus
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The combined influence of two agricultural contaminants on natural communities of phytoplankton and zooplankton.

Authors:  Leanne F Baker; Joseph F Mudge; Dean G Thompson; Jeff E Houlahan; Karen A Kidd
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Developing standards for environmental toxicants: the need to consider abiotic environmental factors and microbe-mediated ecologic processes.

Authors:  H Babich; G Stotzky
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.