Literature DB >> 6220121

Locational representation in imagery: a moving spot task.

F Attneave, T E Curlee.   

Abstract

Subjects with eyes closed imagined a spot moving from cell to cell in a matrix in response to spoken instructions: Up, Down, Left, and Right. After 12 such moves from a given starting point, the subject indicated the final position of the spot. Accuracy was studied as a function of matrix order, which varied from 3 X 3 to 8 X 8. (Visual angles of the displayed matrices were also varied, from 4.6 degrees/cell in one experiment to 1 degree/cell in another, but with little or no effect on results.) The greatest decrement in accuracy occurred between 3 X 3 and 4 X 4 cells. Moreover, showing the subjects a systematic way of structuring matrices (i.e., of dividing them into parts that could be visualized more or less individually) improved performance markedly on all but the 3 X 3 matrix. These results, which agree fairly well with the verbal reports of the subjects, indicate that some capacity limitation of the image system is exceeded in going from a 3 X 3 to a 4 X 4 grid. Implications concerning the nature of imagery are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6220121     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.9.1.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Mental imagery and chunks: empirical and computational findings.

Authors:  Andrew J Waters; Fernand Gobet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

2.  Individual differences in the capacity limitations of visuospatial short-term memory: research on sighted and totally congenitally blind people.

Authors:  C Cornoldi; A Cortesi; D Preti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-09

3.  Commonalities of visual and auditory working memory in a spatial-updating task.

Authors:  Tomoki Maezawa; Jun I Kawahara
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02-22

4.  Locational representation in imagery: the third dimension.

Authors:  N H Kerr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-11

5.  Rate of imagery processing in two versus three dimensions.

Authors:  N H Kerr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-07

6.  Properties of human visual memory for block patterns.

Authors:  T Inui
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Effects of social gaze on visual-spatial imagination.

Authors:  Heather Buchanan; Lucy Markson; Emma Bertrand; Sian Greaves; Reena Parmar; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.