Literature DB >> 6220117

On the Morinaga Misalignment Illusion.

R H Day, S Bellamy, A Norman.   

Abstract

The Morinaga illusion is the apparent misalignment of the aligned apexes of oppositely facing angles. It is also called the Morinaga paradox because its direction is opposite to that intuitively expected from the Müller-Lyer illusion. Six experiments are reported. The first showed that the illusion is greater when the apexes are aligned obliquely than when aligned vertically or horizontally (the oblique effect); the second showed that the illusion is undiminished when the two outer angles are replaced with single lines coincident with the arms of the angles; and the third showed that the illusion is undiminished when the central apex is replaced by a dot but diminished by about half when the two outer apexes are each replaced by dots. The fourth experiment showed that the illusion also occurs with the aligned ends of parallel lines and edges of squares but not with the aligned tangential points of circles of about the same size. Experiments 5 and 6 showed that the effect is markedly greater with small, widely spaced elements. Explanations in terms of perceptual normalization to a line and perceptual assimilation have been considered. The latter explanation is the more plausible of the two, although it is conceivable that both processes contribute to the effect.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6220117     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.9.1.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  The orientation of a parallel-line texture between the verticals can modify the strength of the Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  R Masini; R Sciaky; A Pascarella
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

2.  The Bourdon illusion occurs with straight-, right-angle-, and parallel-edge figures.

Authors:  R H Day; P Mitchell; E J Stecher
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  The basis of the Bourdon illusion.

Authors:  P Wenderoth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-04

4.  How far can attraction-caused misalignment account for the Morinaga misalignment effect?

Authors:  W H Hotopf; S Brown
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

5.  No evidence for apparent extent between parallels as the basis of the Poggendorff effect.

Authors:  R H Day; W J Jolly; F M Duffy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-12

6.  Reduction and elimination of the Poggendorff misalignment effect by minor changes at intersections: implications for the perceptual-compromise explanation.

Authors:  R H Day
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1988

7.  The relation between apparent extent and alignment in the Poggendorff illusion: a response to "No Evidence for Apparent Extent Between parallels as the Basis of the Poggendorff Effect," by Day, Jolly, and Duffy.

Authors:  S Greist-Bousquet; H R Schiffman; R Dorsett; J Davis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

8.  On apparent misalignment of collinear edges and boundaries.

Authors:  R H Day; A P Halford
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

9.  Size and position are incongruous: measurements on the Müller-Lyer figure.

Authors:  B Gillam; D Chambers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-06

10.  The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures.

Authors:  A Mack; F Heuer; K Villardi; D Chambers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.