Literature DB >> 6218940

Geometric determinants of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy.

R B Devereux, M C Phillips, P N Casale, R R Eisenberg, P Kligfield.   

Abstract

Experimental studies have suggested that electrocardiographic recognition of left ventricular hypertrophy depends on geometric relationships involving wall thickness and chamber size. To determine the clinical significance of these observations, we studied the effects of echocardiographic LV mass (LVM), posterior wall thickness (PWT), interventricular septal thickness (IVST) and internal dimension (LVID) on ECG voltage in 360 patients. Standard voltage and nonvoltage manifestations of LVH correlated modestly with LVM (r = 0.33-0.44, p less than 0.001). Sokolow-Lyon precordial voltage (SLV) (SV1 + RV5 or V6) correlated moderately with LVM (r = 0.41, p less than 0.001), but correlated less well with IVST (r = 0.26), PWT (r = 0.24) or LVID (r = 0.22). Stepwise regression revealed that there was no relation, independent of LVM, between SLV and IVST (r = 0.03), PWT (r = 0.03) or LVID (r = 0.01). The 90 patients with increased LVM (greater than 215 g) but without LVH by SLV (false negatives) were compared with the 48 identified by SLV (true positives). False negatives differed from true positives in LVM (298 +/- 72 vs 339 +/- 98 g, p less than 0.01), age (55 +/- 18 vs 44 +/- 19 years, p less than 0.001), weight (70 +/- 16 vs 63 +/- 14 kg, p less than 0.02), and distance from skin to the interventricular septum (42 +/- 10 vs 38 +/- 8 mm, p less than 0.02). Thus, for a given LVM, ECG voltage criteria of LVH are independent of LV chamber dilatation or other geometric variables, but depend on age, weight and LV depth in the chest, suggesting that stratification of subjects by clinical variables has promise for improved electrocardiographic recognition of LVH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6218940     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.67.4.907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  9 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiography: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  N B Schiller
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1985

2.  Sex differences in the relationships between electrocardiographic abnormalities and the extent of left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography.

Authors:  Hikari Ochi; Akiko Noda; Seiko Miyata; Mayo Skegawa; Mitsunori Iwase; Yasuo Koike; Rieko Ito; Hiroshi Yamada; Junki Takamatsu; Mitsuhiro Yokota
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of left anterior fascicular block: a reexamination of the 2009 AHA/ACCF/HRS guidelines.

Authors:  Sandeep Ravi; Vladimir Rukshin; Gilead Lancaster; Stuart Zarich; Craig McPherson
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Correlation relationship assessment between left ventricular hypertrophy voltage criteria and body mass index in 41,806 Swiss conscripts.

Authors:  Roger Abächerli; Lingchuan Zhou; Johann-Jakob Schmid; Richard Kobza; Bernhard Niggli; Franz Frey; Paul Erne
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Effect of comorbidities and medications on left ventricular mass regression after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Mohsin Syed; Mikhail Torosoff; Carl Rosati; Sharon Alger; Steven Fein
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Improvements in ECG accuracy for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in obesity.

Authors:  Oliver J Rider; Ntobeko Ntusi; Sacha C Bull; Richard Nethononda; Vanessa Ferreira; Cameron J Holloway; David Holdsworth; Masliza Mahmod; Jennifer J Rayner; Rajarshi Banerjee; Saul Myerson; Hugh Watkins; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  The effect of obesity on electrocardiographic detection of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy: recalibration against cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  J C L Rodrigues; B McIntyre; A G Dastidar; S M Lyen; L E Ratcliffe; A E Burchell; E C Hart; C Bucciarelli-Ducci; M C K Hamilton; J F R Paton; A K Nightingale; N E Manghat
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.012

8.  Utility of the amplitude of RV1+SV5/6 in assessment of pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Sachiyo Igata; Nobuhiro Tahara; Yoichi Sugiyama; Munehisa Bekki; Jun Kumanomido; Atsuko Tahara; Akihiro Honda; Shoko Maeda; Kazutaka Nashiki; Tomohisa Nakamura; Jiahui Sun; Toshi Abe; Yoshihiro Fukumoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of specific training and competition on myocardial structure and function in different age ranges of male handball players.

Authors:  Brahim Agrebi; Vladimir Tkatchuk; Nawel Hlila; Emna Mouelhi; Ali Belhani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.