Literature DB >> 6218431

Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization.

F Destefano, J R Greenspan, R C Dicker, H B Peterson, L T Strauss, G L Rubin.   

Abstract

In 1978, the Centers for Disease Control initiated a multicenter prospective study to assess the safety of the various female sterilizing operations and the ways in which they could be made safer. During the first 31 months, 3500 women who underwent interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization by electrocoagulation or Silastic banding without other concurrent operations were enrolled in the study. When a standard definition of complications was used, the overall rate of an intraoperative or postoperative complication was 1.7 per 100 women. Several patients factors increased the risk of complications twofold or more: diabetes mellitus, previous abdominal or pelvic surgery, lung disease, a history of pelvic inflammatory disease, and obesity. There was a fivefold difference in complication rates between procedures performed under general anesthesia and those done under local anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6218431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

1.  Hysteroscopic sterilization: history and current methods.

Authors:  James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

Review 2.  Minilaparotomy and endoscopic techniques for tubal sterilisation.

Authors:  R Kulier; M Boulvain; D Walker; G Candolle; A Campana
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

3.  Safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Jialin Mao; Samantha Pfeifer; Peter Schlegel; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-13

Review 4.  Office single puncture laparoscopy sterilization with local anesthesia.

Authors:  G H Miller
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1997 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.