Literature DB >> 6216114

Immunosuppression caused by antigen feeding. I. Evidence for the activation of a feedback suppressor pathway in the spleens of antigen-fed mice.

T T MacDonald.   

Abstract

Sheep red blood cells (SRBC) administered by the oral route to normal mice elicited no detectable splenic anti-SRBC plaque-forming cell (PFC) response until 8 weeks of antigen feeding. At this time a splenic IgA anti-SRBC PFC response was detected. On the other hand, spleen cells taken from mice given oral SRBC for 1-5 weeks showed striking changes in their in vitro anti-SRBC responsiveness as compared to spleen cells from normal mice. This was evidenced by enhanced early (days 3-4) in vitro responses, followed by suppressed late (day 5-6) in vitro responses. Both early enhancement and late suppression were T cell-mediated. Early enhancement appeared to be mediated by helper T cells of the Lyt-1+2.3- phenotype. Late suppression was also mediated by Lyt-1+2.3- cells, but Lyt-2-bearing cells had to be present in culture for suppression to occur. Lyt-2-bearing cells could be replaced with normal T cells. Furthermore, elimination of cells bearing I-J-encoded determinants from the T cell population isolated from the spleens of antigen-fed mice also partially relieved suppression. Thus, antigen feeding appears to activate a feedback suppressor pathway in which Lyt-1+2.3-, I-J subregion determinant-bearing T cells can suppress immune responses by causing normal T cells to become suppressor effectors. No evidence was found to show that antigen feeding induced Lyt-1-2.3+ suppressor cells in the spleen, nor were any serum suppressor factors detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6216114     DOI: 10.1002/eji.1830120912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Immunol        ISSN: 0014-2980            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  Murine gut epithelial cells express Ia molecules antigenically distinct from those of conventional antigen-presenting cells.

Authors:  D Kaiserlian
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 2.  Oral tolerance.

Authors:  W Strober; B Kelsall; T Marth
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.317

3.  Distribution and functional characteristics of antigen-specific helper T cells arising after Peyer's patch immunization.

Authors:  M L Dunkley; A J Husband
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 4.  Antigen-specific therapies for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  D A Hafler; H L Weiner
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  1995

Review 5.  A review of the mechanisms of oral tolerance and immunotherapy.

Authors:  W Sosroseno
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Experimental autoimmune uveitis: molecular mimicry and oral tolerance.

Authors:  V K Singh; K Nagaraju
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.829

7.  Induction of oral tolerance in mice unresponsive to bacterial lipopolysaccharide.

Authors:  M G Saklayen; A J Pesce; V E Pollak; J G Michael
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  The kinetics of oral hyposensitization to a protein antigen are determined by immune status and the timing, dose and frequency of antigen administration.

Authors:  H J Peng; M W Turner; S Strobel
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  Humoral immune response to Bacteroides gingivalis fimbrial antigen in mice.

Authors:  T Ogawa; H Shimauchi; Y Kusumoto; S Hamada
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.397

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.