Literature DB >> 621312

Mechanical circulatory assistance by intra-aortic balloon pumping for the treatment of cardiogenic shock.

J P Bourdarias, R Gourgon, J Bardet.   

Abstract

Although the shock state due to acute myocardial infarction may be reversed by IABP in 80 per cent of patients, 55 to 65 per cent remain balloon-dependent. Therefore some attempt to correct the underlying anatomic abnormalities (reversible ischaemic areas and/or mechanical defects) appears necessary if these patients are to survive. With IABP catheterization studies performed in these critically-ill patients are well tolerated. Myocardial depression after cardiopulmonary by-pass is often related to subendocardial ischaemia. The combination of IABP and surgery has resulted in survival of approximately 50 per cent of patients in cardiogenic shock secondary either to a mechanical defect complicating myocardial infarction or to open-heart surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 621312     DOI: 10.1007/bf01683133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  31 in total

1.  Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in patients in cardiogenic shock, medically refractory left ventricular failure and/or recurrent ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  J T Willerson; G C Curry; J T Watson; S J Leshin; R R Ecker; C B Mullins; M R Platt; W L Sugg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  The role of angiography in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  R C Leinbach; H K Gold; R E Dinsomore; E D Mundth; M J Buckley; W G Austen; C A Sanders
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial.

Authors:  S Scheidt; G Wilner; H Mueller; D Summers; M Lesch; G Wolff; J Krakauer; M Rubenfire; P Fleming; G Noon; N Oldham; T Killip; A Kantrowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-05-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Myocardial changes associated with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  D L Page; J B Caulfield; J A Kastor; R W DeSanctis; C A Sanders
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Factors influencing infarct size following experimental coronary artery occlusions.

Authors:  P R Maroko; J K Kjekshus; B E Sobel; T Watanabe; J W Covell; J Ross; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Quantitative study of infarcted myocardium in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  C Harnarayan; M A Bennett; B L Pentecost; D B Brewer
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1970-11

7.  [Temporary cardio-circulatory mechanical assistance. Present results of a medical department of cardiologic resuscitation].

Authors:  Y Bouvrain; R Gourgon; A Piwnica; G Motte; R Slama; P Beaufils; C Masquet; M Waynberger; F Diamant-Berger; B Eisenmann; C Haas
Journal:  Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss       Date:  1974-08

8.  Surgery for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  M G Miller; J Hedley-White; R M Weintraub; D S Restall; M Alexander
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-12-07       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Effect of isoproterenol,l-norepinephrine, and intraaortic counterpulsation on hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism in shock following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Mueller; S M Ayres; S Giannelli; E F Conklin; J T Mazzara; W J Grace
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Mechanical and surgical interventions for the reduction of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  E D Mundth
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  The measurement and control of myocardial infarct size.

Authors:  M C Apps; J Tinker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 17.440

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.