Literature DB >> 6206733

The usefulness of the Denver Developmental Screening Test to predict kindergarten problems in a general community population.

D Cadman, L W Chambers, S D Walter, W Feldman, K Smith, R Ferguson.   

Abstract

The Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST) was administered to 2,569 children five to seven months prior to starting kindergarten in September 1980 in a geographically well-defined community. The test was administered by trained public health nurses. At the end of the 1980-1981 school year, all 163 kindergarten teachers in the area completed a rating form for each child in their class. The rating form determined global ratings of: 1) learning abilities; 2) classroom behavior; 3) amount of special attention required; and 4) referrals to special education services outside the classroom. The specificity of the DDST in predicting kindergarten teacher ratings was 99 per cent for all areas. Test sensitivity varied from 5 per cent to 10 per cent in detecting problems in the four areas. The predictive values of an positive test varied from 31 per cent for behavior problems to 62 per cent for extra attention required in the classroom. Negative test predictive values varied from 79 per cent to 93 per cent. These results based on kindergarten teacher ratings suggest that, because of the low sensitivity and modest predictive value, the DDST may be relatively inefficient to use in a school entry screening program in a general community population of children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6206733      PMCID: PMC1651854          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.74.10.1093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  A preliminary study of the use of the Denver development screening test in a health department.

Authors:  G M Bryant; K J Davies; F M Richards; S Voorhees
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  Developmental screening of preschool children: a critical review of inventories used in health and educational programs.

Authors:  H S Thorpe; E E Werner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Planning a multiphasic screening clinic for preschoolers.

Authors:  G Law; J M Howell
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1969-11

4.  A preschool screening program on central Vancouver Island: a two-year follow-up.

Authors:  A Thores; J Philion
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1974 Sep-Oct

5.  Clinical biostatistics. LIII. The architecture of observer/method variability and other types of process research.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; M S Kramer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  On allowing for diagnostic imperfections in assessing effectiveness of treatment for Schistosomiasis.

Authors:  M J Goddard
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  The Denver developmental screening test.

Authors:  W K Frankenburg; J B Dodds
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  The morbidity of cardiac nondisease in schoolchildren.

Authors:  A B Bergman; S J Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1967-05-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Preschool developmental testing in prediction of school problems. Studies of 55 children in Denver.

Authors:  B W Camp; W J van Doorninck; W K Frankenburg; J M Lampe
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 1.168

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  The well child exam: what, when, and why?

Authors:  W Feldman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  The screening and diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorders.

Authors:  P A Filipek; P J Accardo; G T Baranek; E H Cook; G Dawson; B Gordon; J S Gravel; C P Johnson; R J Kallen; S E Levy; N J Minshew; S Ozonoff; B M Prizant; I Rapin; S J Rogers; W L Stone; S Teplin; R F Tuchman; F R Volkmar
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1999-12

Review 3.  Periodic health examination, 1989 update: 3. Preschool examination for developmental, visual and hearing problems. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Predicting problems in school performance from preschool health, developmental and behavioural assessments.

Authors:  D Cadman; S D Walter; L W Chambers; R Ferguson; P Szatmari; N Johnson; J McNamee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Reliability of the DDST in predicting later problems.

Authors:  D Sontheimer; M Duprat; W K Frankenburg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Primary Medical Care and Children's Learning Problems.

Authors:  P J McGrath; W Feldman; W Rosser
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Predictive validity of preschool screening tools for language and behavioural difficulties: A PRISMA systematic review.

Authors:  Fiona Sim; Lucy Thompson; Louise Marryat; Nitish Ramparsad; Philip Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alessandra Sansavini; Maria Elena Favilla; Maria Teresa Guasti; Andrea Marini; Stefania Millepiedi; Maria Valeria Di Martino; Simona Vecchi; Nadia Battajon; Laura Bertolo; Olga Capirci; Barbara Carretti; Maria Paola Colatei; Cristina Frioni; Luigi Marotta; Sara Massa; Letizia Michelazzo; Chiara Pecini; Silvia Piazzalunga; Manuela Pieretti; Pasquale Rinaldi; Renata Salvadorini; Cristiano Termine; Mariagrazia Zuccarini; Simonetta D'Amico; Anna Giulia De Cagno; Maria Chiara Levorato; Tiziana Rossetto; Maria Luisa Lorusso
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.