Literature DB >> 6205375

The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imagers on external and implantable pulse generators.

J Fetter, G Aram, D R Holmes, J E Gray, D L Hayes.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the effect of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) scanning on pacemaker function. It must be emphasized that each manufacturer's pulse generators and each pacing modality may behave differently and, therefore, require individual evaluation. According to our results, patients with pacemakers should have their pacing activity monitored continuously during scanning with the NMR 1500 gauss imaging system. External pulse generators should be set to the asynchronous mode and placed outside the NMR image volume but within the radiofrequency (RF) shield. Implanted pacemakers should be verified for type and mode of operation. All implantable pulse generators evaluated reverted from the demand to the asynchronous mode within the magnetic field of the scanner. There was no observable damage to the discrete pacemaker components that were tested. In vivo testing of implantable single-chamber pulse generators did not significantly alter the pacemaker's operating parameters. Changes in stimulation rate analogous to the RF field pulse rate were seen. In single-chamber devices the resultant rate was a multiple of the RF frequency, changing to a value less than the normal asynchronous magnetic rate. With more sophisticated dual-chamber devices the results varied. With VDD pacing during RF scanning, the cardiac stimulation rate increased to a value analogous to the RF field modulation period. More extensive in vivo testing using different models of pulse generators of various manufacturers is needed to identify specific device susceptibility to the RF, time variance and steady-state magnet fields. From these data a comprehensive statement about NMR scanning of patients with implanted pacemakers can be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6205375     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1984.tb05602.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  10 in total

1.  Compatibility of temporary pacemaker myocardial pacing leads with magnetic resonance imaging: an ex vivo tissue study.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Stefanie Drobnik; Reinhard Rzanny; Anas Aboud; Joachim Böttcher; Peter Schmidt; Christian Ortmann; Gita Mall; Khosro Hekmat; Bernhard Brehm; Juergen Reichenbach; Thomas E Mayer; Gunter Wolf; Andreas Hansch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Safety of implanted cardiac devices in an MRI environment.

Authors:  Esra Gucuk Ipek; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Viewpoint: Cardiac implantable electronic devices and magnetic resonance compatibility: was it really necessary?

Authors:  Richard Sutton; David G Benditt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Surgical management of the patient with an implanted cardiac device: implications of electromagnetic interference.

Authors:  J D Madigan; A F Choudhri; J Chen; H M Spotnitz; M C Oz; N Edwards
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  MRI in patients with cardiac devices.

Authors:  Edward T Martin; David A Sandler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of "MR Conditional" designs.

Authors:  Jerold S Shinbane; Patrick M Colletti; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ICDs and pacemakers.

Authors:  Prashant Nair; Ariel Roguin
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2005-07-01

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging conditional pacemakers: rationale, development and future directions.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2012-09-01

9.  MRI and cardiac implantable electronic devices; current status and required safety conditions.

Authors:  A W M van der Graaf; P Bhagirath; M J W Götte
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  You Mi Hwang; Jun Kim; Ji Hyun Lee; Minsu Kim; Gi-Byoung Nam; Kee-Joon Choi; You-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.243

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.