Literature DB >> 6203720

Auditory brain-stem responses in hydrocephalic patients.

N Kraus, O Ozdamar, P T Heydemann, L Stein, N L Reed.   

Abstract

Auditory brain-stem response (ABR) was measured in 40 patients (80 ears) with confirmed hydrocephalus. Eighty-eight percent of these patients showed some form of ABR abnormality. Responses indicative of brain-stem dysfunction consisted of prolonged I-V interwave latency (38%), reduced V/I amplitude ratio (33%), and abnormalities in wave-shape of components III (27%) and V (53%). In addition, 70% of the patients had elevated ABR thresholds; 45% had responses in excess of 20 dB HL and the remaining 25% had no ABR activity. The etiology of the hydrocephalus, head circumference and brain-stem symptoms were not associated with particular ABR abnormalities. Communicating hydrocephalus correlated significantly with both prolonged I-V conduction time and absence of ABR activity, compared with non-communicating hydrocephalus. Four of the 9 patients retested showed ABR improvement on follow-up; one patient showed deterioration. The results were compared to our prior studies of ABR in 60 post-meningitic patients and in 100 severely neurologically impaired institutionalized children in whom the incidence of intrinsic brainstem abnormalities was one-third and two-thirds that of the hydrocephalic group, respectively. The results of this study suggest that ABR can be used to document clinically unsuspected brain-stem pathology that may accompany hydrocephalus. Auditory brain-stem dysfunction is likely to complicate the assessment of hearing sensitivity in hydrocephalic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6203720     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(84)90048-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  7 in total

1.  Somatosensory evoked potentials in children with brain ventricular dilatation.

Authors:  Marjan Korsic; Miro Denislic; Domagoj Jugović
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  Brainstem auditory evoked response in tuberculous meningitis.

Authors:  R K Kapoor; A Makharia; R Shukla; P K Misra; B Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Effects of sedation on auditory brainstem response in Rett syndrome.

Authors:  Joseph P Pillion; Genila Bibat; Sakkubai Naidu
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  Factors affecting quality of life in early childhood in patients with congenital hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Nitin James Peters; J K Mahajan; Monika Bawa; Pardeep Kumar Sahu; Katragadda L N Rao
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Evaluation of brainstem auditory evoked responses in congenital hydrocephalus.

Authors:  N K Venkataramana; P Satishchandra; A S Hegde; G N Reddy; B S Das
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Effect of CSF shunt on brainstem auditory evoked potential in hydrocephalus secondary to brain tumour.

Authors:  S Sood; A K Mahapatra
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  The light-flash-evoked response as a possible indicator of increased intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus.

Authors:  A Sjöström; P Uvebrant; A Roos
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.