Literature DB >> 6203716

Event-related potentials recorded from the scalp and nasopharynx. II. N2, P3 and slow wave.

N Perrault, T W Picton.   

Abstract

Scalp and nasopharyngeal recordings of the N2, P3 and slow wave components were compared in a target-detection task. The effects of probability, interstimulus interval, intensity, discrimination difficulty, attention, stimulus omission and modality were evaluated. Waves of opposite polarity to the scalp N2 and P3 components were recorded in the nasopharynx. The scalp and nasopharyngeal N2 components showed different patterns of variation across experimental conditions. These findings indicate that there are two different cerebral processes occurring at the latency of the scalp N2. The scalp and nasopharyngeal P3 components consistently covaried across conditions, suggesting a single underlying process. The slow wave was observed only in the scalp recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6203716     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(84)90044-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  5 in total

1.  Focal abnormalities of P3 ERPs unveiled in patients with cortical lesions and primary progressive aphasia by average reference recordings.

Authors:  M Onofrj; T Fulgente; G Malatesta; T Locatelli
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Attention modifies sound level detection in young children.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  Possible mechanisms of delay in initiation of voluntary movements.

Authors:  I N Krylov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

4.  "Hit the missing stimulus". A simultaneous EEG-fMRI study to localize the generators of endogenous ERPs in an omitted target paradigm.

Authors:  Aldo Ragazzoni; Francesco Di Russo; Serena Fabbri; Ilaria Pesaresi; Andrea Di Rollo; Rinaldo Livio Perri; Davide Barloscio; Tommaso Bocci; Mirco Cosottini; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Electrophysiological analysis of the role of novelty in the von Restorff effect.

Authors:  Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.